The Summer of Italian Discontent
“The only thing that keeps the ruling coalition together is the loathing of Berlusconi,” Sylvia Poggioli, NPR’s veteran Rome correspondent, told me over the morning coffee last week, “and the fear that after the next election they’d no longer be in power.” In other words, the leftist l’Unione coalition government of “il Professore” Prodi may last longer than many observers expect—its minimal majority and ready-to-read obituaries notwithstanding. Fear of wilderness and loathing of opponents traditionally provide firmer cement to Italy’s political alliances than such outmoded concept as economic ideas or political principles, let alone cultural “visions.”
In practical terms this means that the government’s greatest achievements to date have been to declare a major amnesty of prisoners that boosted crime rates by over 100 percent in some areas, to encourage competition for the entry into certain professions (e.g., lawyers, pharmacists and taxi drivers), and to give 50-70 extra euros a month to the legions of pensioners.
At the same time education, health care and transportation remain starved of the much-needed investment. Prodi’s promises that helped him gain power last year—judicial reform, a law on the conflict of interest, new electoral rules—remain stalled. Even the modest increase in retirement age, from the current ludicrously generous 58 to 61, has been put on the back burner. To keep 14 coalition parties and groups happy, however, Prodi the would-be reformer increased the number of ministries to 26 and the number of junior ministers to 87. Each qualifies for a Lancia with a driver and an office with a secretary—and the glittering prize of a state pension is an added incentive to keep the show on the road. The mega-racket known as Italian politics is mercilessly depicted in The Caste, a book recently published by journalists Gian Antonio Stella and Sergio Rizzo. The “cost of politics” is an overhead far greater in Italy than in any other major industrialized country, and there is no change on the horizon.
The three main leaders of the center-right opposition—Silvio Berlusconi (Forza Italia), Gianfranco Fini (Alleanza Nazionale) and Umberto Bossi (Lega Nord) are hardly the faces of “change.” Earlier this month they met with the President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano, expressing concerns about “the government that doesn’t work” and political situation in the country, but Berlusconi stopped short of calling for a new election.
The secret of Romano Prodi’s survival is in Berlusconi’s unwillingness to retire from politics and let Gianfranco Fini take over the leadership of the opposition. Millions of Italians would like to see Prodi ousted, but only provided that Berlusconi is not the one who will replace him. For as long as the multibillionaire maverick remains the leader of Italy’s opposition, Prodi’s coalition will linger on by default. It may keep “avoiding Waterloos,” as Justice Minister Clemente Mastella memorably put it after last month’s local elections, but it can neither rule nor reign.
Many ordinary Italians as well as political analysts are saying that the country is ready for a “man of action” who can fill the void created by the demise of the Democrazia Christiana—someone who can combine responsible economic liberalism (rather than Berlusconi’s perceived graft) with social and cultural traditionalism that could counter the onslaught of cultural Marxism with its “civil unions” and “asylum-seekers’ rights.” “In Italy we have two lefts and two rights,” explains Fabrizio Maronta of Limes bimonthly journal, but neither the center-left nor the center-right have significant political parties or leaders at the moment. On the center-right a potential contender to watch is Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, president of Confindustria, who denounces “the self-referential nature of political power, which smothers any impulse toward reform within both the right and the left.” On the left, Prodi’s stated ambition is to create the new “Democratic Party” out of the heirs of the Communist Party (the Democratici di Sinistra led by Piero Fassino) and the neo-Christian Democrat Margherita. The experiment is an expression of the desire to marginalize the far left, such as Comunisti Italiani and Rifondazione Comunista, both of which have disproportionate influence at the moment.
In the meantime, northern industrialists will go on developing their business strategies, southern bosses will go on misusing public funds, the courts will continue being strong with the weak and weak with the strong, some taxes will continue to be paid and others will continue to be evaded. Whatever happens in Rome, Italy will retain an impressive capacity to continue functioning regardless of politics and politicians.

Entries(RSS)
Ah, the beauties of operational anarchy - Italian Style!
The Italians at least have choices -- a lot of them -- at the ballot box. We in Gringoland have only two: the Stupid Party and the Evil Party. Some choice. And when they work together, we get stupid and evil.
It is a testament to the character and tenacity of the Italians that they have survived as a nation at all given the last 150 years of complete chaos that has defined their political life; it is much more impressive that they have retained anything resembling a functional Italian cultural and ethnic identity. On this side of the pond, the weak will of Americans is evinced by the fact that our country is, quite obviously to anyone not poisoned by the likes of Fox News and the New York Times, about to disappear as we know it forever. I imagine 2008 is likely to be the last election we see conducted under the current framework with all fifty states participating in a meaningful capacity.
I imagine 2008 is likely to be the last election we see conducted under the current framework with all fifty states participating in a meaningful capacity.
-- Nicholas G.P. Moses
We live in hope! Dum spiro spero.
-- Sid Cundiff, proud member, The League of the South
Mr. Cundiff:
You honestly think that the current framework has all 50 states participating in a meaningful capacity in a national election ? And that 2008 will have such a situation obtaining ?
A question, good sir: what have you been drinking, and where can I get some ?
Your servant,
Lord Karth
"You honestly think that the current framework has all 50 states participating in a meaningful capacity in a national election ? And that 2008 will have such a situation obtaining ?"
I must take the blame for such a statement; Mr. Cundiff was simply concurring. Obviously I was talking about the formal process of electing a president, not whether such a situation would make any difference as to our untimely fate.
"A question, good sir: what have you been drinking, and where can I get some ?"
Since I am in Ireland at the moment, I think you can guess. (I wish I were joking.)
what have you been drinking, and where can I get some ?
My dear Lord Karth:
Rebel Yell, m'Lord. If Your Lordship is in my state (NC), it can be found in wet localities only at the ABC store -- a socialist institution, and one ordained not by Socialists, Social Democrats, and Cultural Marxists, but by Methodists, Evangelicals (both subscriber and non-subscriber to the Westminster Confession), and by tax-takers and statists of all stripes.
Oh, come now, fellows... every election is meaningful. Not necessarily legitimate, but always meaningful.