You have not viewed any products recently.
The big political news this week was that 25 Republican members of the House of Representatives did not vote to re-elect John Boehner as Speaker of the House. Most of those voting against Boehner were conservatives, and the principle source of dissatisfaction was Boehner's pushing through the House a massive spending bill that provided funding of President Obama's executive amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants. The Obama White House, recognizing the good deal it had in Boehner's spending bill, even telephoned recalcitrant Democrats to make sure they voted for it.
Those 25 House members are far from alone in their dissatisfaction with Boehner. This week, pollster Pat Caddell, who rose to prominence working for Jimmy Carter but who later worked for Ross Perot, released a poll showing that only 16% of those who voted Republican in the mid-term elections want John Boehner and Mitch McConnell to be their leaders. In fact, when Caddell asked, "Is John Boehner for average Americans at heart, rather than for special interests?" only 44% of these Republican voters said that Boehner favored average Americans, while 43% said he favored special interests.
Although Boehner flunked the test on the spending bill, Congressional Republicans may soon have another chance actually to favor the average American voters who put them in power. Obama wants Congress to give him authority to negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, and he is counting on Republican votes to get what he wants.
Free trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership have devastated the American middle class. The Washington Post's recent article "The Devalued American Worker" catalogues that devastation. According to the Post, the middle class has gone from encompassing 59% of Americans in 1981 to 51% in 2011, and their share of the national income fell from 60% to 45% during the same period. The Post also reported that two-parent American families earned 23% more than they did in 1973, after adjusting for inflation, but only because such families were working 26% more hours.
Even though the Post, like all establishment papers, has long been a vocal proponent of free trade, its reporters tell a different story. The middle class is shrinking and its income is stagnating because massive numbers of jobs were lost in the last three recessions, especially those "jobs that companies could easily outsource overseas or replace with a machine"; 5.5 million manufacturing jobs have been lost since 1990, and at least 2 million jobs have been lost because of imports from China alone.
If Congressional Republicans want to erase any doubt that they favor special interests over average Americans, they will join hands with Barack Obama and pass the trade deals Obama wants. If, however, they want the GOP to win elections in the future, they will tell Obama no. America needs a large and prosperous middle class, and such a large and prosperous middle class cannot survive if politicians keep doing all they can to facilitate the transfer of American jobs overseas.
Excellent article. But no, the GOP will not "blow" the opportunity this time, they will very carefully betray it.
"Rebuilding the middle class" ought to be the dominant theme of the GOP for the foreseeable future. To do so requires a lot more than just protectionism, however. Broadly speaking, the middle class has been hollowed out because of 1) mass immigration (which not only produces downward spiraling labor competition for Americans, esp blue collar ones, but also involves the importation of lots of outright poor foreigners, which then skews economic demographics); 2) not truly "free", but rather, globalist-managed trade, especially the outsourcing of jobs to places with much lower labor costs; and 3) the huge increase in unproductive/socialist government of all kinds, from "make-work" govt jobs by the millions, to economic growth-killing regulations, to the ever larger number of welfare parasites whom ordinary taxpayers must support, to the Fed, which exists mainly to siphon economic value from small cash holders to Wall Street. For many years I have been proposing a simple mantra for the GOP (or at least conservatives) to express our economic reform agenda as concisely as possible: "Restore Capitalism, Reduce [and Reconfigure] Immigration". IOW, we need an agenda that seeks both to accelerate real (non-monetary) economic growth, and to ensure that the lion's share of that growth accrues to the middle and working classes. And the best way to achieve this is through a full-throated return to free enterprise, which will create vast numbers of new jobs, while simultaneously ending or radically reducing immigration to ensure that the bulk of those new jobs go to Americans. Such an agenda is a winning one, both substantively, and I believe (if properly explained), politically.
They most certainly will blow the opportunity to help what is left of the middle class. However, they won't blow the opportunity to help themselves their political interests, business interest cronies and the snarling ethnic lobbies. Thus they will screw the middle class again.
Right you are, Mr. Piatak--unfortunately for the middle class. Thanks for reminding us.
To comment on this article, please find it on the Chronicles Facebook page.