Polemics & Exchanges

On Saving Social Security

If I read Doug Bandow’s “Social Security’s War on Families” correctly (Views, August), the high-end projection of the cost of Social Security and Medicare would be $50 trillion.  If privatization of Social Security is accomplished, we could expect a $20-trillion decrease over the next 75 years.  This is using high-end figures, which generally become lower-end.  Am I correct that this still leaves Social Security in a $30-trillion deficit 75 years down the road?

The Democrats’ solution to Social Security is to have Social Security taxes applied to 100 percent of taxpayers’ salaries and to add a Social Security tax to dividends and capital gains.  Does Mr. Bandow have any figures on how much money this would raise?  The other possibility is a one-time tax on all wealth.  As Mr. Bandow stated in his article, “all wealth” amounts to only $35 trillion.  So, if they took it all, they still would not be able to bail out Social Security.

        —Larry J. Hall
Elizabethtown, KY

Mr. Bandow Replies:

Subjecting all income to Social Security taxes, like most other tax-hike proposals, would not close the fiscal gap.  The best hope for salvaging America’s fiscal future...

Join now to access the full article and gain access to other exclusive features.

Get Started

Already a member? Sign in here