The American Conservative. " />
You have not viewed any products recently.
"Eight Hundred Dead Irish Children thrown into the sewer by Catholic nuns." So charged Rod Dreher last week at The American Conservative. Dreher was referring to the findings of local Irish historian Catherine Corless, who found that 796 children died at a home for unwed mothers and their children operated in Tuam by the Bon Secours nuns from 1925 until 1961. As part of her research, Corless was told that two boys came upon an underground pit filled with bones in the 1970s. Corless' findings prompted a breathless story in the Washington Post, which reported that "Their bodies were piled into a massive septic tank." Dreher then one-upped the Post, telling his readers why this happened: the "Children [were] seen by Christ's own consecrated brides as so filthy that they deserved burial in a septic tank." Dreher also wrote that the nuns saw the illegitimate children as "subhuman." From this Dreher concluded that "The collapse of Catholicism in Ireland is a judgment upon the Irish church, priests and laymen both, which will not emerge from it until it has paid the last penny." Dreher then disagreed with his friend Andrew Sullivan who used the same story to conclude, even more illogically, that Christian sexual morality had to be abandoned, but both Dreher and Sullivan were in agreement on the evils of the Catholic Church, from which Dreher, a former convert, is now a bitter apostate and Sullivan an equally bitter member.
It now turns out that the story has been grossly exaggerated. On Saturday, The Irish Times--a paper that is about as friendly to the Catholic Church as its New York namesake-- reported that Catherine Corless told the paper that “I never said to anyone that 800 bodies were dumped in a septic tank. That did not come from me at any point. They are not my words.” One of the boys who found the bones in the 1970s, Barry Sweeney, told the Times that "there was no way there were 800 skeletons down that hole. Nothing like that number. I don’t know where the papers got that.” When asked by the Times how many bodies were in the pit, he replied, “About 20.” Nor is it clear that the underground pit found by the boys ever was a septic tank, though it may have been; or that the bodies they saw there were from the home, though they may have been; or that the nuns were the ones who decided to put them there, though they may have been. The Times story also notes that the number of dead children from the institution is "a stark reflection of a period in Ireland when infant mortality in general was very much higher than today, particularly in institutions, where infection spread rapidly. At times during those 36 years the Tuam home housed more than 200 children and 100 mothers." Indeed, the Irish Catholic blog Lux Occulta calculated that the mortality figures at the home are in line with general infant mortality in Ireland at the time.
Four years ago, when the same papers and bloggers trumpeting this story were attempting to blame Benedict XVI for clerical sexual abuse in Milwaukee decades earlier, British atheist Brendan O'Neill made this telling point: “it might be unfashionable to say the following but it is true nonetheless: very, very small numbers of children in the care or teaching of the Catholic Church in Europe in recent decades were sexually abused, but very, very many of them actually received a decent standard of education.” Whatever may have happened at one home for unwed mothers and their children in Tuam, O'Neill's basic point also applies to the vast number of Irish nuns who served in countless schools and hospitals in Ireland and throughout the world in the first half of the twentieth century. Rod Dreher's desire to pass judgment on Irish Catholicism on the basis of one poorly sourced story, and Andrew Sullivan's desire to jettison sexual morality on the basis of that same story, tell us that they cannot be trusted when it comes to the Catholic Church. Nor, indeed, can the myriad of newspapers that gleefully ran with this story.
Mr. Piatak, Thanks so much for the clarification. It would be interesting to see if Mr. Dreher or Mr. Sullivan had anything of a revolutionary nature to say something about "Dr." Gosnell's shenanigans - any demand for secularism to pay its penny's worth of groats - and demand to overturn the current fads in sexual mores? Doubtless, not. Rather, it seems, writers with axes to grind and chips to shoulder reserve their highest dudgeon only for the Catholic Church (and traditional Christianity in general). Meanwhile, the continuing crisis of motes and beams continues apace...
Excellent posting. Please follow up, if you can and may, with more about Dreher's figures. Where DID they come from? Did Dreher simply make them up? I've been under the impression that he's a little odd, but this makes him seem downright mad, like the "feminist" scolds who constantly bludgeon us with impossible statistics, along the lines of "5 out of 4 women are raped before age 6"--and the rest before they're 20, one is coerced to think. And just why can the media not see through or even question such dreadful balderdash?
Trying to sift through the truth for poor Rod, Dreher is like casting pearls before swine. He, Wiegel, Bill Bennet and that bunch all work for the same employer and his name is legion. ---name droppers, magazine salesmen and popularizers who make Tammy Faye and Jim Baker look like decent sinners just doing the Lords work while covering expenses. Christians of course are bound to try and love them just like any other enemy.
Very strong article. We've all heard of the zeal of the convert, but in Dreher's case it seems to be the zeal of the apostate. How sad.
Ray, Dreher got the numbers from the Washington Post story. The point isn't that he made them up; the point is that he's turned so strongly against the Catholic Church now that he will believe anything, no matter how outlandish, so long as it reflects poorly on the Church.
From the moment I read the Post article (as I mentioned to Tom Piatak that day), I was convinced that the story would collapse. There were just too many logical leaps. A total of 796 deaths over a 40-year stretch in a home that size at that time (when Ireland was rocked by, among other things, tuberculosis) was, sadly, not a large number. That some skeletons have been seen in what appears to have been a septic tank or disused cistern does not mean that all 796 people were buried there—nor, for that fact, that ANY of those in the tank were from the years when the home was in operation under the nuns, since it had been a sanitarium before that.
A reporter with a critical eye should see these problems immediately. Dreher didn't see them because he, like the Washington Post reporter, didn't want to see them.
To comment on this article, please find it on the Chronicles Facebook page.