Print

You have not viewed any products recently.

 
 

Brown Revolution in Ukraine: The Cowardice of Viktor Yanukovych

View all posts from this blog

By:Eugene Girin | February 26, 2014

The most surprising thing about the ongoing Brown Revolution in Ukraine is neither the West's support for neo-nazis, nor its immediate acceptance of the armed, violent overthrow of a legitimate president, whose election four years ago was deemed valid by the Eurocrats and the State Department. The most stunning aspect of the neo-nazi putsch is the hapless cowardice and woeful incompetence of Viktor Yanukovych.

For years preceding the Brown Revolution, Yanukovych had a myriad of opportunities to strengthen the political power of the eastern regions of Ukraine. An alternative center of power could've been established in Kharkov, or Dnepropetrovsk, or Donetsk—far from the Russophobic atmosphere of Kiev and Lviv. And instead of rewarding his corrupt and oftentimes, incompetent Donbass cronies with political and financial perks, Yanukovych could've promoted capable, pragmatic young leaders from southeastern Ukraine. He should've also done the obvious: establish wide-ranging autonomy for regions such as Donbass, which were predominantly Russian-speaking and far from the noxious Lviv-Kiev axis. Alas, he concentrated on stuffing his official residence with ostriches and sports cars.

When the revolt has not yet entered its most violent stage, Yanukovych could've easily drawn on his support in the east of the country and established a "counter-Maidan"—thousands of east Ukrainians bused over to surround and stand up to the Galicians. I doubt that the tough, no-nonsense Donbass miners would shirk away from a confrontation with the skinheads. Pro-regime demonstrations should've also been set in motion in the eastern regions and Crimea.

But none of this happened. Yanukovych, from the beginning of the revolt, demonstrated shameful weakness to the bloodthirsty mobs. Even the actions of the police, including the notorious "Berkut" special forces was restrained and inept. What better evidence of the cops' restraint than the fact that at least 16 of them were murdered, some quite brutally, over the course of mere days. One police officer even had his arm torn off by the crazed mob. Scores of police and interior ministry troops were seized by the rebels. The latter, largely young conscripts, were especially pusillanimous and ill-prepared for a showdown with the armed radical thugs.

Finally, the shabby spectacle of "Where in Ukraine is Viktor Yanukovych?!" further demonstrates that the capable Donbass technocrat and manager proved to be a bumbling coward when president. First, he fled Kiev to Kharkov, then to his home turf of Donetsk, then to Balaklava in the Crimea. 

So where is Viktor? Two destinations seem most likely: Moscow and Minsk (cynics also mention the US embassy's basement). Speaking of Minsk, the EU/State Department hydra tried to pull a color-coded revolution there a few years ago. And unlike Yanukovych, Lukashenko had the courage to clear the rebels off the street. Indeed, Belarus is no country for sold men.

Comments

 

 
Jim
Tulsa
2/26/2014 03:13 PM
 

  Thanks for the update, Mr. Girin. I hate to inject a negative, however. I found it disconcerting to encounter so many "could've", "would've" abbreviations in a Chronicles article, even if it is "just a blog". In the comments -- no problem, but in the articles I would recommend against it. No offense intended.

 
 
Eugene Girin
Forest Hills
2/26/2014 04:22 PM
 

  No offense taken, Jim. The article was written as it was because it would've (here I go again!) dishonest and silly to criticize Yanukovych for his bumbling cowardice without explaining what should've been done to prevent the Brown Revolution. It's always easy to criticize a political figure when you don't have any concrete suggestions on what should've been done differently.

 
 
Louis
San Antonio
2/27/2014 12:16 AM
 

  Yanukovych was obviously using some form of STRATEGERY. It makes no sense to anyone but himself. Perhaps he should've given asylum to some Chechnyans also. Then he could've been seen as a real Wetard.

 
 
LettersFromCanada
Toronto
2/27/2014 03:02 PM
 

  I would agree 100% with Jim. There is an old saying " Fool me once, shame on me....". This is the second "revolution" raised under Yanukovych's nose. Should have learnt the lesson and sweep the "activists" right from the day one. It's a pity that the country will be most likely split, that never bring happiness to anyone, as I know from my personal experience from former Yugoslavia.

 
 
Eugene Girin
Forest Hills
2/27/2014 06:35 PM
 

  No need to regret the split of an artificial, stillborn entity like Ukraine. Let the west have their radical nationalist dream come true and stop mooching off the industrial east. Crimea should become part of Russia like it was for hundreds of years before 1954. And the east will either rejoin Russia eventually or continue as an industrial, pro-Russian Ukraine.

 
 
Print

You have not viewed any products recently.

 

To comment on this article, please find it on the Chronicles Facebook page.