Image Credit: 

Flickr-Lorie Shaull, CC BY-SA 2.0


Explaining Minnesota’s Radical Political Nature

As recent events have caused the eyes of the nation and the world to focus on Minnesota, a question I’ve wondered about has resurfaced: Why is Minnesota so politically radical?

That Minnesota’s politics are radical is seen in a simple survey of the state’s prominent politicians. Both of Minnesota’s two U.S. Senators, Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, are decidedly left-of-center Democrats. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz can be seen on TV inciting Black Lives Matter (BLM) crowds and rioters in situations that would seem to call for restoring civil peace.

Keith Ellison, the state’s Attorney General, is an enthusiastic backer of Antifa and a convert to a black nationalist form of Islam. Ellison was an outspoken fan of Mark Bray’s The Anti-Fascist Handbook. With its call for revolutionary violence, Minnesota’s chief law enforcement official has glowingly displayed Bray’s book as his preferred reading material.

And let’s not forget Ilhan Omar, the radical leftist Congresswoman from Minneapolis, who expresses support for Islamicists. Omar personifies what the French call “islamo-gauchistes,” political figures who blend Western cultural radicalism with effusive sympathy for Muslim Fundamentalists.

One may be tempted to attribute this political radicalism to the black population in Minnesota, which votes heavily for the left and which is quite visible in and around the Twin Cities. But since there were only 382,612 black residents in the Gopher State in 2018 out of a total population of 5.61 million, this variable doesn’t explain the situation fully. By comparison, neighboring Wisconsin had very similar numbers, with 389,652 blacks out of a total state population of 5.81 million in the same year. We might also note that since blacks have a much younger median age than whites, they may be less likely to belong to Minnesota’s voting population.

Most of the state’s radicalism, then, is a white phenomenon, and the explanation for this carries us back into Minnesota’s political and cultural history, where Northern European Protestants have long perpetuated this radical tradition. The Scandinavian and (to a lesser extent) German populations that settled in this region were heavily influenced by European socialism. The creation of a social welfare state in Sweden in the 1920s, which aimed at reconstructing social relationships as well as redistributing income, made a favorable impression on Minnesotans.

Norway also influenced the state, with 1960s Minnesota Governor Karl F. Rolvaag, who was of Norwegian descent, touring that country after World War II to learn about its socialist state and economy.

Allan C. Carlson, who has written extensively on Scandinavian culture in the Midwest, seems to suggest that most of the settlers in the area were religiously and socially traditional. But Minnesota’s Swedes and Norwegians may have been the exception. The degree and persistence of their left-leaning politics made them different from even those Germans and Scandinavians who landed in Wisconsin, including German immigrants who went there as radical refugees from the 1848 revolutions in Europe.

The National Farmer Labor Party, founded in Minnesota in 1918, became a powerful advocate for social measures for both agricultural and industrial workers. In 1944 this party merged with the Democratic Party at the national level, without abandoning its own reform energies—or affinity for Scandinavian social democracy.

“Minnesota was settled largely by churchgoing Scandinavians and Germans, who were ‘moralistic and public regarding,’ and tended to agree with the notion that government had a role to play when it’s in the best interest of everyone,” retired Carleton College professor Steven Schier wrote last year in a Star Tribune article, “Why Is Minnesota More Liberal Than Its Neighboring States?” “That ethos has persisted in the state’s consistently high voter turnout over the years, and it has frequently benefited left-leaning candidates in elections.”

This may explain why Minnesota continues to vote for candidates like Ellison, Walz, and Omar. Minnesota’s politics may further be explained by a characteristic of ethnicities with radical leftist tendencies in the U.S. and elsewhere in the West, namely, the ease with which they fit into larger ethnic communities. This is also seen in Minnesota with Somalis, and may have been equally true for Scandinavians in nonurban Minnesota, such as radicalized Finns from the Iron Range, from whence came Gus Hall, the last head of the American Communist Party.

Unlike the onetime situation in Europe where Christian churches and Marxists once fought for the souls of their towns’ residents, ethnic groups have generally accepted their own radicals. Thus, leftist Scandinavians in Minnesota may have attended the same churches as the less radical ones, intermarried with them, and then indoctrinated the next generation. In contrast to a European society in which the forces of revolution and order battled each other even within the same families, ethnic groups in America have accepted their co-ethnic radicals, providing they pose no threat to their in-group.

As a graduate student at Yale in the mid-1960s I noted with bemusement that every Nordic-looking classmate from the “land of Paul Bunyan” gravitated toward the campus left. These leftists were not alienated hippies, but members in good standing of the communities in which they grew up.

Correction: The original article stated that Minnesota Governor Karl F. Rolvaag studied Scandinavian countries, when in reality it was Allan C. Carlson. We regret the error and the article has been updated to reflect this issue. 

Paul Gottfried

Paul Gottfried

Paul Gottfried is editor in chief of Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture. He is also the Raffensperger Professor of Humanities Emeritus at Elizabethtown College, where he taught for 25 years, a Guggenheim recipient, and a Yale Ph.D. He is the author of 13 books, most recently Fascism: Career of a Concept and Revisions and Dissents.

Add a Comment


Join the conversation...

You are currently using the BETA version of our article comments feature. You may notice some bugs in submission and user experience. Significant improvements are coming soon!


Dear Dr. Gottfried, ¶ On the other hand, it could be maintained that the anti-racism ideology is not leftist. It has roots in the Frankfurt School, which in the aftermath of the failure of the proletarian revolution to triumph in Western Europe, focuses on the emancipation of the middle class from capitalist culture, without identifying a force or process for the taking of power from the capitalist class by the people. The Frankfurt School and other currents of twentieth century critical Marxism and neo-Marxism are neither Marxist nor leftist in the traditional sense. In addition, as the black political scientist Adolph Reed maintains, the new anti-racism ideology today seeks racial parity within the established order of neoliberal capitalism, and thus it is an anti-leftist oppositional tendency within neoliberalism, undermining the potential for forging a large, broad political base seeking social transformation. If this be true, the influence of the anti-racist ideology in Minnesota today may be less a manifestation of leftist influence and more an indication of the superficiality and decadence of leftist discourse today, cut-off from its social and intellectual roots, and finding itself incapable of recognizing an ideological enemy. ¶ I always enjoy and appreciate your columns. In this case, I appreciate your recognition of the ethnic differences and diverse ideological currents among white immigrants. I myself am the proud descendant of Irish Republicans. ¶ Best wishes, ¶ Charles McKelvey, Professor Emeritus, Presbyterian College, Clinton, South Carolina


Media endlessly trumpet "Scandinavian socialism". Norway is rich because of oil. Sweden got a headstart as the industry wasn't bombed by Britain in WWII, like it was in France, Germany and Benelux, etc. Swedes are also a Germanic people with probably the most innovative businesses in the world, in proportion to the population. Automated match-making machine, modern zippers, refrigeration, dynamite, ball bearing, automatic light-house, etc. DESPITE the Social Democrat parasites. The Social Democrats in Sweden controlled schools, universities, radio, television through govt monopolies post-WWII, that's why they controlled politics. The Right only won one election in the 1980s, back when it was still three-year terms. Then again in 1992 as the leftists crashed the economy with Keynesian stimulation, deregulating the bank sector at the wrong time, with govt-owned banks spending freely. 50 businesses went bankrupt every day in 1992. After the Right lost the next election the Socs quietly kept their changes. Pharmacies remained privatized, for example. Private hospitals and dentists work hand in hand with public. Specialists are mostly private clinics, integrated in the system where tax money follows the patient. People could no longer get no-demands welfare while laughing at those who paid. Private television and schools were allowed to remain, but the government made sure to cripple private schools - not allow them to choose their students, for example. They favored the leftist Bonnier family who write many school textbooks and run TV 4, the only TV channel that got to use the tax-funded land-based distribution. No private TV news could compete with the govt's Channel 1 and TV 2, with their money and headstart. The Left massively sped up the import of voters, as Swedes were steadily abandoning the Left since the 1980s. The Socs, communists and media-created Green allies would not have won a single election after the 1990s without mass immigration.


"The ravenous wolf (ie "wolves")" that Jesus reportedly warned His Apostles about seems to be "cynicism". All these coteries (?) seem to stake a claim to insulate their population from it (aka hate). Humanity is capable of the best and worst imaginable. Bipartisanship (checks and balances) could be a solution (what The Founders prescribed?) if only everyone were conscientious about their opinions.


These poor gods-hearted souls are the ones that get ruthlessly knifed, once the door has been opened to the evil totalitarians in their ranks. These fellow travelers never seem to learn. Our Country is not the land of a few million Nordic tribesmen who are comfortable with a rather large public sector. Our very nature, as bearer of the Light on this planet (presumably the Project for which our Father in Heaven has created American Gathering Angels, according to Lorna Byrne), invites attack by The Dark Force, so we must get it right. We can’t escape Duality at this level of existence. The Sound of one hand clapping will not be heard with the physical ears


You perpetuate the falsehood that "socialism works in Scandinavia!" Scandinavia had prosperity because of oil in Norway and because Sweden wasn't bombed by Britain in WWII like France and Germany, so the industry thrived. And because of great innovation in business. This is DESPITE of the socialist parasite party, not because of it. Their many fantasy projects all failed and they quietly moved Right in economics in the 1990s. Media won't tell you this.