You have not viewed any products recently.
One of the many unfortunate trends in today's American politics is that being wrong on significant matters seems to carry little penalty, while being right on significant matters seems to carry little reward.
Consider those who told us that the invasion of Iraq was going to be a "cakewalk," with American troops being greeted as "liberators" and the war paying for itself because of Iraq's oil wealth. Now, after the loss of thousands of American lives and hundreds of billions of American dollars, we should know better. But too many of us don't, because those who peddled the Iraq War are now beginning to peddle a war with Iran, and many Republican presidential candidates appear to be listening. Indeed, Bill Kristol's son-in-law, Matthew Continetti, has recently written an article denouncing Jeb Bush adviser (and former Secretary of State) James Baker for being insufficiently deferential to Bibi Netanyahu and stating, "It's W's advice Jeb Bush should be listening to, not James Baker's."
Allan Brownfeld has written a powerful piece on this phenomenon. Brownfeld notes that John Bolton, Joshua Muravchik, and Bill Kristol have all advocated attacking Iran, just as they advocated attacking Iraq. Of course, Iraq used to act as a counterweight to Iran, until we overthrew Saddam Hussein. Now, Iraq's Shiite dominated government is essentially allied with Iran.
Brownfeld also notes that the neocons have a long record of exaggerating Iran's aggressiveness, reminding us that one of the favorite gurus of the Bush Administration, Bernard Lewis, predicted in 2006 that an Iranian attack on Israel was imminent.
The neocons also have a long record of exaggerating Iran's military capability. By contrast, Brownfeld quotes eminent Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld as stating that, far from being a budding superpower, Iran is a "Third World country" whose defense budget is "a little more than half of Israel's and less than 2 percent of America's. Iran, in fact, spends a smaller percentage of its resources on defense than any of its neighbors except the United Arab Emirates."
Brownfeld correctly locates the neocons' bellicosity in their rejection of traditional conservatism. In fact, the neocons' ultimate intellectual roots are Trotskyite. George W. Bush's administration ended in failure because he accepted the unwise counsel of the neocons. Any Republican president who follows Bush in his choice of advisers will meet the same fate, assuming he can even convince a war-weary electorate to put him in the White House.
Great article and link. It is baffling to me how the neoconservative "whiz kids" , so reminiscent to me of McNamera's civilian whiz kids at DOD back during the Vietnam war, could be consistently wrong in their strategy and tactics for dealing with the threat of militant Islam and yet still dominate the GOP foreign policy agenda. John Bolton particularly is worthy of note for his repetitious calls for getting us into more wars in the Middle East. Bolton bragged to his Yale classmates about avoiding military service in Vietnam, "I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy," wrote Bolton. Yet, he doesn't mind sending young Americans to die in multiple wars in the Middle East. As a Vietnam Veteran and former Reagan official, I have utter contempt for that bag of wind. The hit piece on James Baker by Kristol's son-in-law is reminiscent of the smear jobs the neocons did on Mel Bradford, Pat Buchanan, Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, et al. The technique is classic Trotskyite--character assassination against anyone who poses a threat to their agenda and won't go along with the "party line". Neocons are not conservative and have more in common with the utopian Left. Republicans had better figure this out before it is too late.
Great article, Tom.
Makes me think of the movie, The Postman, where Kevin Costner's character says, "Wouldn't it be great if wars could be fought just by the a******s who started them?"
Michael, I can see it now: Generals Bolton, Kristol. Cheney, Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, and their junior officers Frum, Continetti, et al, leading the battle charge to overrun Tehran.
Great article, Tom. The Trotskite pedigree can never be mentioned too frequently. And don't forget: these guys would have happily remained Democrats, if the party had kept nominating LBJ types. Which means that ultimately they will be gung-ho for Lyndon lover Jeb. The GOP is hopeless unless they shed the neocons
The Neo-cons, Bolton and ilk not only want multiple wars from here to infinity with others people children. But they salaciously approve of the unbridled spying on the American populace, amnesty and open borders for the lower continent hordes. Perhaps they see them as fresh fodder for their wars, to replace the Southern White boys?
To comment on this article, please find it on the Chronicles Facebook page.