If you don’t read the others’ posts, you can’t expect to find what you’re looking for in them.

Anyway, the problem many modern Christians seem to have is with separating the spiritual and political worlds. In the Lord’s eyes we’re all equally His children, but such is not the case with us in the material world of his creation.

Off topic: Some (atheistic) pagans argue that Christianity is dysgenic, and this too is simply not true. We can help the weak and the poor without helping them to reproduce… The evolution obsessed (who are among the most leftist – love of evolution is little different from creative destructives or perpetual revolutionaries, though I want to say the latter are pursuing a final world order.)

The OT bit doesn’t apply to you, Mr. Hader. I simply think it belongs with the rest of this post.

—

Also, if anyone actually bothers to read my posts , it should be clear that I do not believe all but race should be ignored. Without the tradition, culture, and religion to guide us, we cannot hope to save our nation. Ignoring everything else is profoundly stupid. Also, of course the nation exists to serve the Lord.

That said, I agree that the pending war with Iran and similar issues should be of little concern relative to the American demographic crisis. We are not responsible for the emperor’s crimes against Iran. Saving our own is our duty, and we should wish to do nothing less.

—

An addendum in case Mr. Hader or someone else actually reads my post and can benefit…, since the fed is working to destroy America, its power should be reduced. Since abortion is immoral and corrupts us, it should be opposed. To ignore them totally is as stupid as hoisting up one at the expense of all else. Those who sacrifice the immigration issue for abortion are failing to do their duty and should thusly be shamed. Such males should not be recognised as men. That said, David Duke who promotes abortion because of its demographic results is a monster and should not be recognised as human (meaning he should not be respected. He should not be harmed of course.) We can oppose immigration and support repatriation without embracing murder, including abortion; violence; hate; or other un-Christian acts. For the Lord of the Rings fans: reject the ring of power – it only seems to offer what you want. Embracing abortion will destroy your nation.

Mr. Hader, read Race and the American Prospect which can be purchased at the occidental quarterly.

Sincerely,

Little Frankie (who fears his posts in the Writebacks have never made a positive difference )

Second, why is it that NO ONE on this site EVER addresses the substance of my consistently similar writebacks wrt the problem of race?

Again, for Mr. Willoughby and others who just don’t “get it”, why don’t you try answering my question (variants of which I have been posting for months or maybe years on this site): how will traditional America, and by extension Western Civ, survive if whites should become a minority in our own historic territories?

And second, if race, specifically the non-white immigration invasion and colonization of the West, is not the most important issue of our time, what is?

I call all discussion of EVERY OTHER ISSUE BESIDES RACE ‘treason’ (it is also arguably sinful from a Christian perspective) not because there are not many other political and social issues of importance, to me and all other conservatives, but because the racial invasion seems to be the only issue/policy whose deleterious effects we can never undo (well, we could undo even it … but not without a bunch of Christian blowhards blathering about the alleged dangers to their ’souls’ from executing the necessary actions; funny how an earlier generation of Christians didn’t offer up much objection – no worries about the souls of the WW2 generation – to the militarily superfluous mass-incineration of a million German women and children in the Spring of 1945, but hey – killing white people is fine for the Christers, it’s just the coloreds, who are ever so respectful and considerate of us, that we need to fawn over until the end of time … for the sake of our souls …..).

But because the CHRONICLES crowd can’t stomach the measures of racial cleansing and repatriation which will be necessary if our race and therefore civilization is to survive in perpetuity, it seems to be all the more vital that we mobilize ALL our energies now to stopping non-white immigration, as well as to engendering a new racial consciousness among whites, who will need it to assert their own cultural prerogatives in the public square (and we must assert ourselves, or our far more assertive racial enemies / competitors will own our future, and our descendants will ultimately be genetically absorbed into the mongrel morass).

Discussing or agitating on other issues is functionally, and sometimes intentionally, treasonous because such merely serves to distract us from the real issue, and therefore prevents our operating with maximal efficiency, and possibly endangers the ultimate agenda (survival of the West). Suppose Course A is the most effective way to achieve a certain national security objective, but the SecDef vigorously argues for Course B, which he knows will be far more costly and may possibly even jeopardize the chance of overall success. Can it not be said that SecDef is behaving treasonously (of course, we would need more details to establish whether he was really a traitor, or merely stupid)?

If America and the West were not being invaded and occupied by the Third World, then obviously our white racial survival would not be at issue, and conservatives could frolic in other policy vineyards to their hearts’ content. But we are under demographic attack. If we do not repulse that attack, then the end of the West will be certain. If these facts and prognostications are (empirically) true, then it follows that persons who agitate against any issues of lesser importance (abortion, taxes, regulations, etc.) are effectively reducing the chances of Occidental survival, whether deliberately or not (ie, out of stupidity). I call such people traitors.

We can’t blame the Jews for all of our problems.

I’m from the South, and I can tell you that though blacks aren’t as intelligent they would do much better if they quit blaming the white man and sought out better jobs.

—

That’s right. Quite “simply”, as you say. Only “in the best interests of their own people” (here we are on the same page). Such as, acquiring Palestine, Middle East, U.S.A. – and beyond. Of course, ruling the whole World by proxy requires some petty sacrifices (such as American lives, not only in N.Y.C., but also in Iraq, Iran – and beyond).

“as we should be for ours.”

Here, btw, we very obviously part our ways.

I meant that Western nations should generally act in their best interests as do the Jews. This is what healthy nations do.

However, I stated previously in this thread that Christians should act within Christian morality.

This should read: It’s all in the books, most of them written by non-Serb WW2 historians.

“conncections” are, of course, “connections”

There must be dozens of typos left, but I’m giving up. An edit-version would be great on this site.

thanks for the (MUCH-NEEDED!) corrections you’ve made (195) in regard to your previous comment (191). Yes, any comparison of Serbs with Nazis would not be only “too extreme”, it would be also an outrageous rape of my nation’s history, knowing that the Serbs were the FIRST ONES to rise against Nazis in occupied Europe and to have the greatest percentage of resistance figthers (practically, the whole people) in entire Nazi-occupied part of the continent. And up to one million Serbs died in Nazi retributions, raids and concentration camps (the most infamous, Jasenovac, held by Croatian Nazis, where more than a half a million Serbs, along with tens of thousands of Jews and Gypsies, died in the most horrid imaginable circumstances). If you’re looking for a Nazi-conncection, try with our neighbors. I’m not playing the Hatfield-McCoy here (nor trying to insult anyone), but that is the history, like it or not. It’s all in the books, most of the written by non-Serb WW2 historians.

Plus, there is no such thing as “white nationalism” as a visible political platform among Serbs. Even the most “right-wing”, “far right-nationalist” party in Serbia is (as we speak) being the most popular among Gypsy/Roma-community, believe it or not.
And Milosevic himself was an old school-leftist, without a drop of any racist sentiment (unlike, for example, his Croatian counterpart, Franjo Tudjman, a vicious Holocaust denier, or Alija Izetbegovic, Bosnian Muslim leader, an ex-SS trooper, turned into an Islamic fundamentalist). Or just check the data on ethnic diversity of Serbia, and compare it with the other ex-Yu states.

I’m not enaging into a Balkan discussion here, which would hopelessly turn this topic away from its initial subject. Just trying to help you with the facts and figures you’ve mentioned. You don’t have to believe me or take my word on anything, but please, next time check the facts (on Google or elsewhere) before labeling the first European anti-fascist nation in such inappropriate manner.

Yeah, “some to do”. We were all born yesterday, and so have no clue what that might possibly be.

“but it’s America’s own corruption that has given them such influence.”

Nostra culpa, right. (“btw”, isn’t there a Shia sub-sect that practices self-flagellation? I had always beleived they lived in wretched Iran.)

“They’re simply acting in the best interests of their own people”

That’s right. Quite “simply”, as you say. Only “in the best interests of their own people” (here we are on the same page). Such as, acquiring Palestine, Middle East, U.S.A. – and beyond. Of course, ruling the whole World by proxy requires some petty sacrifices (such as American lives, not only in N.Y.C., but also in Iraq, Iran – and beyond).

“as we should be for ours.”

Here, btw, we very obviously part our ways.

Most here would agree that Israel has some to do with our war in the Middle East btw, but it’s America’s own corruption that has given them such influence. They’re simply acting in the best interests of their own people as we should be for ours.

I was replying to the post made by “WD” and not one by Brian Wheeler.

I apologise for the murkiness of my post number 230.