Is Mitt Serious About Condi?
The first criterion in choosing a vice president, it is said, is that he or she must be qualified to be president.
Yet there is another yardstick by which candidates measure running mates. Do they bring something to the table? Can they help with a critical voting bloc? Can they bring a crucial state?
Lyndon Johnson is regarded as a brilliant choice by JFK, though his brother Bobby, among others in the Kennedy camp, loathed LBJ. LBJ locked up Texas and helped bring home five other former Confederate states for the Roman Catholic nominee from Boston.
In deciding on a vice president candidate, many considerations have to be running through Mitt Romney's mind.
His choice must be seen as ready to be president or at least able to attain that status in short order, and augment his strength with a strategic constituency or help corral a major state he would otherwise have difficulty winning.
Then there is the iron rule of the Hippocratic Oath: Primum non nocere. First, do no harm. The VP candidate also should be conversant with a panoply of issues, fully prepared to defend the nominee's positions on domestic, foreign and economic policies.
Such considerations suggest that whoever in Romney's camp floated the name of Condi Rice to The Drudge Report last weekend was more concerned with changing the subject from Bain Capital and the Caymans than in signaling where the candidate's head and heart are today.
That Rice is accomplished and competent is not in dispute. But should Romney choose her, within hours we would be re-litigating the Iraq War. It was, recall, Rice who slapped down skeptics of that war by implying their reluctance to invade Iraq might just be risking a nuclear surprise attack on the United States.
"There will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam can acquire nuclear weapons," said Rice. "But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
Rice was George W. Bush's leading saleslady for a war that cost America $1 trillion, 4,500 dead and 35,000 wounded, and cost the Republican Party both houses of Congress in 2006 and the presidency in 2008. That war is today regarded by many U.S. foreign policy scholars as among the greatest strategic blunders in American history.
Should Rice be chosen, she will be spending much of the campaign defending her role in that war. And Gov. Romney will find himself defending, or disagreeing with, what George W. Bush did a decade ago.
Rice is by her own admission "mildly pro-choice" on abortion, a position mildly anathema to religious conservatives, the foot soldiers of the party, many of whom have been only lately won over to the governor himself.
Rice's whole career has been devoted to foreign policy. Can she be brought up to speed in weeks to learn and recite the new catechism of the party and defend it from a hostile press or in debate with Joe Biden?
Most Republicans have no idea where Condi stands or what she believes about right to life, gay marriage, affirmative action and the Arizona immigration law. Asked whom she voted for in 2008, Rice reportedly said, "I just want to acknowledge that when the (2008) election took place and after the election took place, it was a special time for Americans."
Did the candidacy of John McCain make it a "special time"?
My friend and former White House colleague Peggy Noonan says that when she mentioned the possibility of Condi Rice as vice president to a gathering of business types, "spontaneous applause burst forth." Condi's nomination, she wrote, would be truly "exciting."
Peggy's got that right. The right is boiling with excitement already.
But would it be wise for Romney, who bears no responsibility for the record of George W. Bush, to choose a running mate who would force him to defend a Wilsonian policy of compulsive interventions across the globe "to end tyranny in our world"?
The choice of Rice would be a Romney endorsement of the Bush foreign policy of which she was co-architect, having spent four years as the national security adviser and four as secretary of state.
Tim Pawlenty could help carry Minnesota. Sen. Rob Portman could help secure Ohio. Sen. Marco Rubio would likely deliver Florida and help in a Hispanic community that is 16 percent of the U.S. population and may in 2012 constitute 9 percent of the vote.
Can Condi Rice deliver California? What does she bring?
When a candidate is facing what seems an insurmountable lead, he will often consider a roll of the dice.
Ronald Reagan's team, 20 points down, considered putting ex-president Gerald Ford on the ticket. Walter Mondale, 20 points down, picked a congresswoman from Queens whom America did not know. John McCain picked Sarah Palin.
But candidates who are running even tend not to take huge risks. Surely there are other ways to shift the subject from Bain Capital.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Entries(RSS)
Pat knows, to paraphrase another, that Romney has let all the voters know, whether the voter wishes him well or ill, that he shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any foe, oppose any friend, in order to assure the survival and success of his campaign.
Years ago when Pat Buchanan was advocating a tax on Global outsourcers to at least slow the export of America's manufacturing base, the GOP gave him the heeve ho and invited his followers to board a Greyhound bus, provided by Bush's boys and the McCainiacs to head right out of the GOP. When they wanted to start their dirty little war they attacked again with little men like David Frum, Billy Kristol and Karl Rove.
And of course the Evil Party is even worse, lead by even bigger liars, if that is possible. The only similar thing about the old protectionists like Dick Gephardt and the New Winners like Clinton were the quafoo hairdoos. The nice thing about this election is it absolutely makes no difference whatsoever about anything being discussed today in public. Affordable Healthcare is here to stay thanks to all the GOP appointments that were "the only thing that mattered" when conservative folks were supposed to hold their nose and Vote Bush. Telling jokes is nothing to criticize in a party full of politicians who have been telling lies for years. The problem is when the music stops and the jokes are no longer funny --- regardless of who they pick for VP.
How far to the left of the Mondale-Ferraro ticket will the Romney-Rice ticket run?
Mr. Reavis,
... "whether the voter wishes him well or ill, that he shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any foe, oppose any friend, in order to assure the survival and success of his campaign."
That is without doubt the best re-jiggering of JFK's warning to the world that USA was comin' to git ya I've ever heard; and extra appropriate in that probably only JFK can approach Romney's invincible self-regard.
If you are of the opinion that both stinkers up for election stink just as bad, however, I have to say that I believe the re-election of the man from nowhere and everywhere will be even worse for the country than the alternative. I think it's undeniable now that his presidency gives blacks a sense of permission to indulge in anti-white mayhem and ever - escalating demands. In his last term I predict they will pull out all the stops to get what they can while they can.
The only thing I would add, Mr. Jacobi, is that there might be a pulling out the stops on anti-white sentiment (although, to be fair, Hispanics and certainly Asians get a good helping of hostility thrown there way) even if the golden boy does NOT win another term. While one can always hope for the best, I can't say I would be surprised if, on election night, it is announced that Romney wins, certain places in this country will erupt in what is now acceptable "post-Rodney King" esque behavior.
Gilbert and Vince,
When the country, the people and the culture you love is being intentonally dismembered piece by piece, I don't think it matters whether it is destroyed by wolves or nibbled to death by ducks. But my state will vote for the gaggle of ducks and geese if it is any consolation.
"...there might be a pulling out the stops on anti-white sentiment (although, to be fair, Hispanics and certainly Asians get a good helping of hostility thrown there way) even if the golden boy does NOT win another term."
Yes, it is the definition of being between a rock and a hard place. But I've a feeling that the post-defeat violence would be less prolonged than what could follow 4 more years of license.