Obama’s Biden Problem
Despite our high expectations, Vice President Joe Biden's first months in office were disappointing. This, remember, is the man who opened the more recent of his two futile runs for the presidency by saying of Obama that he was "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Yes, I mean that Joe Biden. The one who hollered at wheelchair-bound Missouri State Sen. Chuck Graham, to "stand up." The one who plagiarized a speech by Neil Kinnock. In other words, a man who has flung himself into one rhetorical pratfall after another with the unswerving momentum of a blind rhino.
But then, as Biden and his wife, Jill, ensconced themselves in the vice president's official residence at the Naval Observatory in northwest Washington, came a phase of decorum, irksome to those wagering that the former senator from Delaware is incapable of keeping his foot out of his mouth. There were those who said sadly, "Joe just isn't Joe any more."
They were wrong.
Appropriately, it was on the topic of Israel that, as vice president, Biden first tossed aside unmanly prudence. Even given the zeal of almost every member of the U.S. Congress to satisfy the Israel lobby, Biden has always been conspicuous for his slavish posture toward the Holy State. Accepting Obama's offer of the vice presidential nomination last summer, he announced emphatically that he would not have considered accepting the invitation if he had entertained the slightest suspicion that Obama was not 100 percent in Israel's corner. In fact, the Israel lobby did entertain these unworthy suspicions, which is why it pushed strongly for Biden as veep.
It wasn't far into Obama's first months in the White House that the lobby began to feel that even though Obama's chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel, their suspicions were justified. The president dared to mention in public the right of Palestinians to some form of state. He said the settlements on the West Bank had to stop. (True, he didn't say anything categorical about actually existing illegal settlements.) He seemed too eager to parley with Iran, too demure on the topic of its nuclear program.
On July 5, George Stephanopoulos interviewed Biden in Baghdad for his Sunday morning talk show on the ABC network and promptly put the question: "if the Israelis decide Iran is an existential threat, (and) they have to take out the nuclear program militarily, the United States will not stand in the way?"
Biden lunged for the driver's wheel and swerved U.S. government policy in a whole new direction: "(W)e cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do when they make a determination, if they make a determination that they're existentially threatened and their survival is threatened by another country."
The White House spent the next two days categorically denying that it was giving—via Biden—Israel the go-ahead to make a unilateral attack on Iran. The United States is "absolutely not" flashing Israel a green light to attack Iran, U.S. President Barack Obama told CNN in Moscow on July 7. "We have said directly to the Israelis that it is important to try and resolve this in an international setting in a way that does not create major conflict in the Middle East."
Then, in the same Stephanopoulos interview, Biden sucker-punched Obama again, addressing the failure of Obama's stimulus program to halt the surge in unemployment and prompt recovery, a failure that has the president tumbling in the polls.
In devising this program, Biden confided—correctly—to Stephanopoulos, the Obama administration had "misread" the extent of the economic catastrophe it inherited.
"The truth is, we and everyone else misread the economy. The figures we worked off of in January were the consensus figures and most of the blue chip indexes out there."
As Obama made haste to controvert his vice president, Biden fans, lolling on their Sunday-morning couches, jumped up and punched high-fives to the heavens. Joe was back, more brazen than ever in his traditional blend of mendacious self-justification. His claim that in late January "we and everyone else" misread the economy was complete nonsense. Economists like Joe Stiglitz and Paul Krugman had immediately denounced the stimulus package as way too small and that the White House was squandering irretrievable amounts of political capital.
So why did Biden embarrass his boss internationally and then rub his nose in a catastrophic economic misjudgment? The nose-rubbing isn't so hard to explain. Biden is a notorious flapjaw. He can always talk his way into a fix. He's spent his political life doing it.
As for Biden crossing Obama regarding Israel and Iran, vice presidents are not supposed to contradict presidential policy. But Biden's genuflections to the lobby are so ingrained, he simply can't help himself.
Obama surely must be thinking: Where is Dick Cheney, now that I need him? As Bush's veep, Cheney gave his boss the limelight, kept his mouth shut for eight years. Everyone said he was really the man running the country.
No one thinks Biden is running the country, and maybe this is the core of Obama's Biden problem. Almost all politicians are narcissists, and Biden, more than most, is narcissistically vulnerable. It's why he has so often got into trouble for lying about his achievements. It's why, as a senator, he couldn't stop talking. It's why Obama can look forward to plenty of strenuous exercise hauling the vice president's foot out of his mouth. Obama's honeymoon phase is dwindling to a close. Biden will be there to signal the wrong turns and say that they weren't his fault. Obama would be well advised to send his vice president on secret peace missions to Afghanistan and hope that the first warlord Biden starts haranguing will saw his head off just to stop him talking.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Entries(RSS)
"Despite our high expectations, Vice President Joe Biden’s first months in office were disappointing. "
I can see how Biden would be a disappointment to any benighted leftist who may have voted for him. He hasn't surprised or disappointed anyone with the requisite number of brain cells to have seen Biden for what he is.
"Biden confided—correctly—to Stephanopoulos, the Obama administration had “misread” the extent of the economic catastrophe it inherited."
This comes close to tying your record for promoting the greatest number of fallacies in the fewest words. Biden wasn't "confiding" anything to Stephanopoulos. He was running his mouth, as usual. The Obama administration would have had to attempt to understand the catastrophe in order to have "misread" it. The Obama administration didn't "inherit" this catastrophe and, in fact, Obama and the thieves he has working with him were in the forefront of those creating the catstrophe during Obama's short tenure in the Senate. The taxpaying public has had this catastrophe foisted upon us by the political and financial classes. Obama and his clients will not suffer from the catastrophe, so it can't be an inheritance for him.
"Then, in the same Stephanopoulos interview, Biden sucker-punched Obama again, addressing the failure of Obama’s stimulus program to halt the surge in unemployment and prompt recovery, a failure that has the president tumbling in the polls."
You sound as though you actually expected your Indonesian pretender's daylight bank robbery for the benefit of his Goldman Sachs clients to have had some beneficial result. This an example of Biden and Obama's "good pol/ bad pol" routine. They'll play this scene any time they think people are foolish enough to pay any attention to it.
"Obama’s honeymoon phase is dwindling to a close. Biden will be there to signal the wrong turns and say that they weren’t his fault. Obama would be well advised to send his vice president on secret peace missions to Afghanistan and hope that the first warlord Biden starts haranguing will saw his head off just to stop him talking."
Of course you see Biden's silliness as a convenient hook on which to hang blame for Obama's fall from godhead status in the public eye.
Thanks for finally getting to the typical leftist's tactic of debate: You openly wish for his death by vicious murder. Leftists always reveal the hatefulness in their hearts if one listens long enough.
Mr Roberts, you are right on the mark in your third paragraph. However, you last one may be a bit harsh. I thought Mr Cockburn's closing sentence was hilarious.
I like Joe Biden. He makes me laugh.
“(W)e cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do when they make a determination, if they make a determination that they’re existentially threatened and their survival is threatened by another country.”
Boy, Biden sure didn't think so in 1999 when he "reached across the aisle" and with McCain co-sponsored "measures" (a.k.a., "killings") against Serbians for daring to stave off the terrorism on their own soil that was aided and abetted by a neighboring hostile country.
He even lectured the Serbs on their own soil (in a church even, where the local bishop did not want him!) only weeks before this statement was made and days before Albanian terrorists set off a bomb in southern Serbia's Presevo Valley. That bombing and hundreds of other violent acts perpetrated by Albanians have been conveniently ignored in the media non-reporting that only serves to craft the official storyline. (In this case, that Albanians are just poor old down-trodden patriots, never acting on their Islamically-honed instincts that drives the slaughter of Christians. And Serbs are prejudiced evil-doers whose thousand years of Christian faith only underscores that fact. And, finally, that the USA was just in its truncation of the latter's state to benefit the former.)
Yeah, he's one "funny" dude, Biden.
After hearing Biden during the campaign, I predicted he would be replaced in two years. Obama himself was probably wishing he could do a takeover. Beyond his verbal gaffes, it's amazing he was chosen for his so-called foreign policy expertise! Obama won't put up with him. He'll choose a woman to be his new vp, to trump a woman running on the GOP side.
Mr. Roberts, will you concede the possibility that Cockburn, despite his leftism, is not a literal-minded Marxist puritan? I believe that Cockburn finds Biden loathsome and this column is an attempt at humor at the Veep's expense. High dudgeon at the literal meaning of Cockburn's words appears to be misplaced. Surely, foe instance, one does not "confide" to a TV personality on national television. The use of such a verb is intended as ironic. You dislike the Left. Excellent. But Cockburn's fringe of the Left dislikes the Democrats with the same (or similar) zeal that many here feel towards Republicans or neocons. You have amply displayed subtlety of thought elsewhere on this site. Does the mere presence of a Leftist attempting humor make you see red?
Eagle, you are 100 per cent correct.
Joe Biden is one of many "Western" politicians who acted for the Islamic jihadists in Europe (Bosnia etc).