<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s Good for Rockford Acromatics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2008/07/05/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-rockford-acromatics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2008/07/05/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-rockford-acromatics/</link>
	<description>Your home for traditional conservatism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Gervaise</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2008/07/05/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-rockford-acromatics/comment-page-1/#comment-170411</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Gervaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=660#comment-170411</guid>
		<description>Scott, given that gas is $4 a gallon here in Beltwayland, and that people commute 45 mins to an hour each way each day, you might want to mention how little time the citizens of Rockford spend driving to work in their palnts and shops.  Re-building small manufacturing towns in the Rust Belt might be the fuel-saving shot in the arm environmentalists don&#039;t get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, given that gas is $4 a gallon here in Beltwayland, and that people commute 45 mins to an hour each way each day, you might want to mention how little time the citizens of Rockford spend driving to work in their palnts and shops.  Re-building small manufacturing towns in the Rust Belt might be the fuel-saving shot in the arm environmentalists don't get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zander</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2008/07/05/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-rockford-acromatics/comment-page-1/#comment-168558</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=660#comment-168558</guid>
		<description>Scott write me a novel about the kid who went to work for the fbi.

that was hot. just continue it, even if you make it up - and write it in a month. make some money. it&#039;s ok. who cares. money isn&#039;t everything, it&#039;s almost everything sadly today. but it will stay that way unless we go back to a barter society. i hear you. if it&#039;s still leisurely the way you&#039;ve got it now GREAT. but don&#039;t cry about anything then to us who are still hopping. hop, hop. except good work, that does make us laugh. 

the problem with america in &#039;like&#039; cosmic terms is when even the real don&#039;t get it. it&#039;s my guess. if the pre-existent world isn&#039;t &#039;pernicious&#039; per se... it&#039;s perspicacious in that it&#039;s not &#039;dumb&#039;. i think if you combine the two pernicipicacious - you get closer. there&#039;s no safety or time-outs...paradoxically there seems to be resting in action - (and praying i.e. begging a lot). no kidding. then there&#039;s whatever else there is. which i do not sponsor. write the novel, scott. like it&#039;s what everything is do or die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott write me a novel about the kid who went to work for the fbi.</p>
<p>that was hot. just continue it, even if you make it up - and write it in a month. make some money. it's ok. who cares. money isn't everything, it's almost everything sadly today. but it will stay that way unless we go back to a barter society. i hear you. if it's still leisurely the way you've got it now GREAT. but don't cry about anything then to us who are still hopping. hop, hop. except good work, that does make us laugh. </p>
<p>the problem with america in 'like' cosmic terms is when even the real don't get it. it's my guess. if the pre-existent world isn't 'pernicious' per se... it's perspicacious in that it's not 'dumb'. i think if you combine the two pernicipicacious - you get closer. there's no safety or time-outs...paradoxically there seems to be resting in action - (and praying i.e. begging a lot). no kidding. then there's whatever else there is. which i do not sponsor. write the novel, scott. like it's what everything is do or die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock H.</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2008/07/05/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-rockford-acromatics/comment-page-1/#comment-168522</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=660#comment-168522</guid>
		<description>Certainly you have it within you, Scott, to connect the dots on this one. This is a GOP conspiracy. Without the same-sex marriage issue emanating from Massachusetts for Dubya to exploit, he would not have turned out the extra masses of values voters in Ohio, and we would now be seeing the end of John Kerry&#039;s first term. Out of seven justices, I believe only one or two on the California High Court are Democrats, and at least five are Republicans. Is it not possible, maybe even probable, that this decision was handed down expressly for the purpose of returning the issue of family values to center stage for another election, so that this year&#039;s GOP candidate can use it again and ride it into the White House? I do not believe that the Massachusetts justices were doing this in 2004, for that court was and still is overwhelmingly Democratic, but the GOP might have gotten the most wicked and shameful idea from that experience, watching Bush masterfully bring the Religious Right to the polls, and now Republicans on a Supreme Court on the other side of the country have the chance to use their positions on the Court again - not to push left-wing ideology down the state&#039;s throat, as the Massachusetts High Court was doing, but this time to do quite the opposite, to get the values voters on their feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly you have it within you, Scott, to connect the dots on this one. This is a GOP conspiracy. Without the same-sex marriage issue emanating from Massachusetts for Dubya to exploit, he would not have turned out the extra masses of values voters in Ohio, and we would now be seeing the end of John Kerry's first term. Out of seven justices, I believe only one or two on the California High Court are Democrats, and at least five are Republicans. Is it not possible, maybe even probable, that this decision was handed down expressly for the purpose of returning the issue of family values to center stage for another election, so that this year's GOP candidate can use it again and ride it into the White House? I do not believe that the Massachusetts justices were doing this in 2004, for that court was and still is overwhelmingly Democratic, but the GOP might have gotten the most wicked and shameful idea from that experience, watching Bush masterfully bring the Religious Right to the polls, and now Republicans on a Supreme Court on the other side of the country have the chance to use their positions on the Court again - not to push left-wing ideology down the state's throat, as the Massachusetts High Court was doing, but this time to do quite the opposite, to get the values voters on their feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

