Your words:

"The USA is the author of the Univeral Republic, a new order."

The roots of the "new order" put forth their first fruit in the French Revolution, the roots thereof going much deeper. Thirteen of the twenty and some odd British colonies asserted their ancient rights as Englishmen over against a Crown and upstart Parliament which were trampling rights going back at least a far as the Magna Charta. This is hardly being "the author of the Universal Republic, a new order. In fact, the thirteen colonies were already republics which established a union thereof. But neither with the Articles of Confederation nor with the Constitution did the create a "nation" or "A republic."

Now, I would agree with you if you want to talk about Lincoln and his "Republicans." That, as we say in our climes, is a horse of quite a different color.

Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it...have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.

The Doctrine of Original Sin, Works (1841), ix. 205.

If ever there is a requirement to break a nation from within, then the best way is to allow in millions of Muslims into the country, while protecting the invaders under the umbrella of multiculturalism.

And so it has been

There is hardly any doubt that opening the gates to unrestricted immigration of Muslims into Britain will be regarded as supreme betrayal of the people of Britain. This was done knowing full well that such an invasion will destroy the UK.

G K Chesterton wrote a fictional novel “The Flying Inn”, that set out such a course of events, a political elite that sets out on the Islamisation of Britain - but who would have ever guessed that such an elite would ever be in existence, leave alone in power.

And what about the Serbian swimmer who was banned from competition for wearing a "Kosovo is Serbia" t-shirt?

Freedom of speech is more equal for some than for others, it seems...

Your right but I think terming it as zionism is a bit of a cop out. Jewish communism and feminism and demonization of christian culture was a major force before the creation of the zionist state and things like pro abortion and radicical feminism dont directly benefit the Jewish state.

The problem with Russia is that the US and Europeans hate Russians so they supported the communist invasion of Russia for 20 years prior to the anti Russian takeover over Russia in 1917 and support these ant-Russian jewish oligarghs who were in control of Russia during the 90's.
Representatives of the former Yukos oil company have had meetings with whitehouse officials in the whitehouse gathering political support whos main shareholders are fled to the safety of Israel and in Britian organised crime boss Boris Berezovsky brags that he has influence and friends in both Labour and Conservative parties.

How can people write articles and talk about the upcoming clash between "Islam and Western civilization", without talking about Zionism.

The way I see it, perhaps a little simplistically, is that the Jewish interests that control the banking, Federal Reserve, and media in this country, who have pushed for open borders and political correctness at home and a globalist agenda abroad, are the same interests that control the EU and their banking, media, and immigration policy. In fact all our so called neo-cons are nothing but a bunch of Trotskyites from days gone by, pushing for the same ideals, undermining our constitution and civil liberties to put money and power into Zionist pockets.

Is radical Islam dangerous? Yes. Would it ever stand a chance if Europe and North America stuck to some conervative Christian roots? Absolutely not! Hard to do though when you are being sabatoged from within.

I found it rather disgusting to see Zionists in the US clamouring for the bombing of Serbia in 1999, and supporting the separation of Kosovo. This was not a Muslim problem. Zionists, using US taxpayer dollars imported radical Islam into Yugoslavia, and created the problem as part of their agenda. Serbia stood in the way of their plans and they made an example of them. Now Iran stands in the way, and they are next. Putin's Russia also stands in the way but unfortunately you cannot just bomb them. So instead, you fund terrorism and revolutions in their backyard to undermine their influence. In addition you do a media campaign to try make Putin look like a tyrant who is backtracking on democractic reforms.

Islamic extremism is just a tool to bring about a "clash between Islam and the West" and create international government. It is not the problem. I believe that to solve the problem confronting Europe as well as America, one needs to identify the true problem. I believe Zionism is a bigger threat than radical Islam. I fear Zionist control of Russia much more than an Iran armed with nuclear weapons. Perhaps I am being naive.

I am open to any comments.

Agreed, not the same court, but it's beginnings are the Russian Emperor's creation. You may not like the outcome.

The Lisbon treaty and the EU also had beginnings and that beginning is found with Our Founding Fathers, as you state "The founders of the United States overthrew the colonial government for offenses far lighter than those of which the Euro-traitor class is guilty."

Overthrew the old order to establish the new order.

You and I do not like the new order of things, but you and I disagree on how the new order of things started. Always look to the beginning of a political movement to see how it will run out it's course. You do not do this. Complain about the EU etc but it's start was with the Independance of the USA. We created the current order of things. We refused the Divine Order of things. The USA is the author of the Univeral Republic, a new order.

Did anyone bring up Kosovo during this conference? I seems hypocritical to discuss the islamic threat to Europe while they recognise a stste in the heart of it founded by islamic terrorism and organised crime.

@11michael warning and @12Srdja Trifkovic

I've never heard of this ICJ (the International Court of Justice) where did you find information about this?

Is there any good books or websites about how communism came to Russia. When they talk about communism in Russia they only discuss it in detail from Stalin on upwords as if he usurped some great political movement and downplay the overwelming Jewish involvement in the Bolshevik regime (out of the 330 members in the first communist government over 300 were jewish and there was only 13 ethnic Russians) or even give a positive spin on Jewish characters like Leon Trotsky.
Jacob Shiff funded the Japanese during the Russo-Jap war and personally bragged that he contributed $20 dollars to the bolsheviks during the so-called "Russian Revolution". Years prior internalional press printed anti-czar articles in the press and Rothschild banking held back loan payments to Russia.

As even modestly intelligent and superficially informed obesrvers are well aware, the court godfathered by the Czar is the ICJ (the International Court of Justice), founded a century ago, whereas the kangaroo imitation that killed Milosevic is the ICTY. Confusing the two is on par with believing that the Federal Reserve Board is a bona fide USG institution.