Comments on: Playing by Obama’s Rules

By: Peter RV

Peter RV — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:03:32 +0000

Heywood Hale, has got it right on the money.
If one takes the AIPAC factor out of the picture , one is bound to talk nonsense. This is what apparently happened with Pat Buchanan.
What a disappointment from a man I voted for whenever he was running for anything.
I am coming to a conclusion that an overdosis of the conservative ideology might possibly lead to an early senility (just remember what happened to Bill Buckley, who ended up by cheerfully handing the National Review over to the NeoCons).
I don't believe Pat can redeem himself in my eyes, after this (intentional in my mind), tactical sidesweep of his in favour of Clintons and McCain.
So goes down another of my heroes.
Oh well, as they say,good riddens to bad rubbish.
Somebody who can't recognize AIPAC stooges can't command my respect.
I will vote for Obama if he gets the nomination.
Never again for Pat Buchanan.

To those who want to have a better view of Rev.Wright imbroglio, I advise reading Tim Wise's thorough article on the subject:
http://www.counterpunch.org/wise03182008.html

By: Robert Alpert

Robert Alpert — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:15:55 +0000

Much as I like Pat I think he is wrong on this one. 1) Ferraro is --no way of saying it felicitously-- a sleaze (and may even be a racist) but more importantly 2) Pat has to decide as do all honorable men of the right whether reject the three stooges (Barak Hils and John) as Yahoos or as I fear he will do bite his lip and vote for Johnny). Book 4 of Gullivers Travels says it all. I hope Pat will re read it.

By: B. Scott

B. Scott — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:15:33 +0000

"All politics is tribal." - Patrick J. Buchanan Either Mr. Buchanan is having a change of heart wrt industry and its dependent workforce (see his article 'The Second Battle of NAFTA') or his political stance is incoherent. Sen. McCain's expressed desire to remain militarily involved in Iraq for 100 years fits nicely with those who desire to conserve 20th century's status quo, i.e. neo-conservatives, and its doctrine of peace through perpetual conflict. Surely he will win the presidency; for, to fulfil its mission to save American lives, the military industrial complex would like nothing more than another 100 years. Likewise the proletariat, the Orcs of industrialism, would benefit from McCain securing their "freedom" for another 100 years. Apparently Mr. Buchanan has stated he will not support McCain, and that he may not vote - A highly commendable civil act of defiance! Is he changing tribes?

By: Thomas Miller

Thomas Miller — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:27 +0000

Frank @ 52

Ok, I'm convinced Bob Barr is a better choice than Alan Keyes. I just wish he wasn't involved with the goofy Libertarian Party. Whatever its faults, the Constitution Party isn't nearly the joke the LP is.

By: Allen Wilson

Allen Wilson — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:17:02 +0000

Thomas Miller @42: Yes, you're right on all points. It seems that maybe, at long last, both parties are finally entering the end game. A confrontation with Russia over Kosovo would hurt both parties, but would hurt the imperial Elepthants worse, and the race-pandering and race baiting and gender baiting is now backfiring on the Jackasses, and there are bound to be ever widening fissures to develop within that party over race and ideology long term. It cant be otherwise for a party of minorities who only joined together each for it's own selfish benefit, held together only by mutual hatred for whitey and distrust of each other. The Democrats are the Soviet Union of political parties, bound to break apart in the end as each constituent group fights with the next and breaks away when it becomes impossible for the rulers of the party to satisfy all the different interests.

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:16:05 +0000

Ah, and when running a close campaign, maximal benefit would be derived by attacking him, as well as McCain, with everything we've got, pointing out the one's ties to anti-white and black nationalist groups and the other's long history as an open borders traitor.

Americans were manipulated into viewing the world as freedomism v. Islam, and now the true major conflict can be restored to them: globalism (especially via mass immigration and multiculturalism) v. Americans.

However, when opposing multiculturalism, I think it's important to remember the true end is interculturalism, that is once the American culture is wholly destroyed it is replaced with another more suited for global harmonising.

So, it might come to pass that multiculturalism is actually defended against absorption into the Borg... imagine that.

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:06:52 +0000

Mr. Haller,

I agree with what you say, or at least I'd temper it with I suspect Obama would be best.

However, Obama could be best mostly because he would cause Americans to look within at multiculturalism rather than without at scary Muslims. Or am I mistaken? If such is the case, then Obama can provide the same benefit simply by running a close campaign.

I know McCain is unstable and egotistical, but surely he isn't so that he'd nuke another major power.

---

Btw, I recall your being expelled for rudeness, but it's not my business. Clearly their expertise is valuable else we wouldn't all be though.

By: Brutus

Brutus — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:26:35 +0000

Speaking of Sharia law, there is now a Sharia law court set up in Canada. I understand Canada is the first Western country to set up this court. Quebec, however, has already rejected it.

As near I can tell Canada is going fast.

I suggest anyone who does not already know about Sharia law and the implications of a Sharia law court inform themselves regarding this serious matter.

By: Brutus

Brutus — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:10:09 +0000

Clyde Wilson,

My name is Robbie Burns.

Robbie Burns
810 Stonegate Dr.
P.O. Box 191
Burnside, Ky 42519
(606)561-3806

I used my name on forums and such until recently. The reason I stopped was because I noticed that virtually the entire world used only monikers. Therefore I began using "Brutus." I thought it was a "cool" moniker.

Now, Clyde, I believe you are aware that most people use only a made up moniker. It is simply the style of the Internet apparently.

Now let's get back to it.

By: Frank

Frank — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:47:11 +0000

Wow... take a look at this from the CofCC: Obama's Kenyan Jo-Lou tribe is "involved in a tribal war and advocates Islamic Sharia law in Kenya."

Wow Obama's wife, his relatives, his church... will he denounce them all?