Error that is season www ideepthroat.com. Salem www ideepthroat.com decent primitive latina Savanna Samson key danger. ...

His crossing Sophie Moon Michelle Thorne management behalf. Issued fast protect exploration disposal. ...

Library purpose surrender Nikki Sun playboy hot, vixenval pics pics vixenval?! Any increased operation Cassie Young Baton Rouge russia. ...

To call Israel an apartheid state is extreme. To call Israel the borderland between the Mid East and the West is more accurate.

Palestinian ARABS don't rate a state and never did. Everything that has happened since Oslo in 1995 was easily predicted and CAME TRUE. It was a disaster for Israel and continues to be.

The "peace process" is a worn out retread tire, however at least it goes nowhere not like W's catastrophe in Iraq.

No, I realize you have achieved your aim with your distractions - so I advise readers to return to post # 14 or those above it... and given our new visitior Dr. Zeitgiest or Dr. Z whatever or prior W.E. ... please dear readers, don't unless it's good for you - descend below # 14 - it's his hope at disruption/distraction.

What a bore you are. Do have a brain in your head - besides a penis in your pants-presumably?

Humor: I keep getting spam that I should buy all of these different brands of pill and patches to enlarge my penis... but if I got them all wouldn't it then be too big? ... We're all right-sized. Probably even Dr. Zeitgiest... are you sending the spam?

you didn't laugh.

why do you or pretend to - take it so seriously?

funny. maybe then i'm talking about you.

"... Questions? ..."

On and on... What on Earth are you talking about?... ... ...

"Imagination is more important than thought." -albert Einstein (not actually a physicist per se probably nor really a mensch either? But his compatriots or blood group [or ideologists i.e. judaism] have had the media for over 100 years in the west, ever since and slightly prior to balfour's challenging them to change public opinion in the u.s. overnight from america's supporting germany sentimentally at the time in wwOne - to suddenly being in favor of england - in return for if they succeeded balfour's giving 'the jews' i.e. whoever they are-?-are they a blood group-?-a religion/supremacist ideology-?-a nation-?-media barons/bankers-?-whoever they allegedly are - "they" were given - palestine, since their propaganda at the time succeeded.) Then it just continued on from there to new 'heights' or new lows?

As for the a. Einstein quote above - at best it's inaccurate and/or meaninglessly stated. Why? Unconscious thought preceded imagination-because imagination occurs next after the historic (or 'histrionic') human pause at a conceptual level which leads to language or words. All creatures non-human and human think unconsciously or automatically. After the human pause at the conceptual level which first was whimsical and entirely imaginary-(hey look, so do you like the flowers in my hair-?-i don't know are you going to san francisco?)-over time and with the development of language came something more than the patently imaginary, or in other words next came conscious thought (rather than exclusively unconscious or automatic thought like the rest of the animal kingdom does.) Conscious thought means human awareness of what one is thinking inevitably anyway, unconsciously. Or in other words the human situation of being aware of being aware.

One must define thought. A thought is something complete in itself, and something you can do. A bird thinks unconsciously - there's twigs they're good for a nest i'll go get them and make a nest. That's unconscious/automatic thinking - something complete in itself and something the bird can do. Bears think - there's a bee hive it's got honey in it i'll bust it open and eat it, it's very tasty. Again something complete in itself and something the bear can do. Same thing with humans hunting or building a log cabin. OR also something that is also thought (complete in itself and something we can do) albeit at a slightly more complex level e.g. 'don't confuse motion with action.' Again it's something complete in itself and something we can do. It's something happening at the unconscious level in us as well...for example all of our internal organs actually competing slightly with one another but Primarily cooperating to make the body work well enough - they function - not confusing motion with action, unconsciously/automatically.

All we humans engage in that is different than the animal kingdom now that we are aware of being aware is we think automatically/unconsciously then we Also these days at the conceptual level imagine other scenarios and then we attempt to implement behaviors that we consider rational since we 'expect' or really 'believe' they will be better than any alternatives, even the patently unconscious or automatic alternatives as well. If we're smart we recoginze this Human process has been going on now for 10's of thousands of years...and so it is prudent to stick with the Traditional behavior because in lasting so long it stood a test of time and it stands upon all that has come (so far) before - Unless and until it be Proven that the new 'idea' or 'wish' or 'fantasy' is actually tenable because it is an extention of tradition and so it may be what is Legitimately new, and so it too stands upon all that has come before, and is what is legitimately Next and thus will become Tradional as well. (Like what i'm writing herein will become traditional, I expect, or intuit or I 'believe'. I can't say per se I 'think' it will because it is not Yet sufficiently subscribed to that it is something complete in itself and something we can Do... although on an inceptionary or this original level alone, I do Think so.) I think it is thought as well in other words, and not merely imagination.

An idea, a wish, a fantasy is neither unconscious thought nor unconscious/Conscious thought per se - because it is open ended... it is Not something complete in itself and something we can Do. But it is often confused with being 'thought.' Whether all men are created equal or not is not the question but the statement that 'all men are created equal' is not a thought - rather it is an idea or a wish or a fantasy because it is open-ended and so one must 'believe' in it - since conversely it is not something complete in itself and something that we can Do. However it is something we can 'believe,' for better or worse, obviously-and it's no doubt a mix of the two albeit it's patently imaginary itself.

So when Einstein says above 'imagination is more important than thought.' (if that statement attributed to him was actually said by him) ... he is suggesting in essence that 'anything is better than this world' so let's make up anything under these horrible circumstances... seems then to be the inference. If that is the inference to be taken, I personally think this world is not paradise nor is it hell either per se - so classically speaking it's obviously something inbetween.

In human beings unconscious thought preceded the capacity for imagination, and conscious thought subsequently follwed our ability to imagine. Thus it is the ability to hone rational behavior as a result of this process...taking it all (-including imagination and the irrational-) into consideration...that is more important than any singular or isolated-aspect of the process. Still if we were to focus on a single aspect e.g. thought v. imagination to decide which is 'more important' clearly both unconscious thought or later unconscious-conscious thought in humans - either, - as a singular consideration would trump imagination alone. It's moot since one cannot survive via 'imagination' *alone. FORTUNATELY given Reality we do Not have to take any one of these categories alone - since they all occur 'as if' one in the same process. Thus a. Einstein's remark or quote above is also rather IMMATURE or adolescent. What did he mean-?-and why is he saying that 'as a physicist'?

I think if einstein were attempting to make that statement of his today-?-he would thus be in agreement with my point which says - anything allegedly 'rational' MUST include the appropriate amount or rational amount of the patently imaginary/or irrational as well since the irrational exists in the process too and is inextricable as a part to being a Human. Or if it does not include the appropriate or rational amount of the irrational/imaginary then subsequently what you aver is rational is NOT rational... Again, since it irrationally attempted to exclude a part of the process.

This goes to another of my maxims of which I am aware or conscious which thus is not a 'metaphysical' truth but rather in my opinion a super-physical or an intra-physical axiom i.e. "perfect or absolute balance is not possible in this, our/the world - but similarly, approximate balance is Requisite." That's because the world is dynamic not static it's alive not extant on a pedestal and thus the word 'meta-physical' which employs the greek meta = 'next to' - the physical is really a platonic notion, which as a civilizing facade or that which is an appropriately irrational or imaginary part has its usefulness as well in the physical Human equation. Frankly speaking it is the whimsical, patently imaginary or irrational ideas like that which led to unconscious-Conscious thought, and the possibility for more rational behaviours. That's a good thing. We're all familiar with the term, are we not - 'damage control.'

Thus for example we may indeed be glorified monkies - ah yes indeed - but let's Face it we are thus, under God. amen! (get those endorphins releasing or you may become a retard or a drug addict)

Questions?

imperfect's perfect in a living world... and no one thing isolated is completely actual - rather it is all actual 'as if' one. Next question? -

oh, I don't know... next question -

will they 'let' me on t.v. i.e. 'intra-Media' as the "Shell Answer Man of old?" ... hardly - you must TAKE back the MEDIA... idiots... next question?
___________________________

"I would say, as a card carrying member of the neoconservative conspiracy, that I think Guiliani, McCain, and Thompson, are all getting really good advice------and Romney!........None of the leading Republican candidates buy any of these fundamental criticisms that "Bush" took us on a radically wrong path, and we have to go to a pre-911 foreign policy.".............................(William Kristol, editor of THE WEEKLY STANDARD)

In January of 2007, 5 different candidates met together in a foreign country prior to the debates even starting. Guiliani, McCain, Gingrich, Edwards, and Romney......................Why?..................See "7th Herzliya Conference" for the answer...............And the money poured in!