<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sauce for the Goose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/</link>
	<description>Your home for traditional conservatism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-25570</link>
		<dc:creator>G.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-25570</guid>
		<description>Mr. Roach -- sorry, my mistake.  Actually I think I have heard that surname before, now that I think of it.

Hucbald:  If I&#039;m not mistaken, when the riots in France broke out, not a few neocons argued that the French were getting their just deserts for being elitist-racist cheese-eating surrender-monkeys, no?

A specific article at NRO, effectively cheering the Arab rioters, was posted right here in Chronicles, as I recall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Roach -- sorry, my mistake.  Actually I think I have heard that surname before, now that I think of it.</p>
<p>Hucbald:  If I'm not mistaken, when the riots in France broke out, not a few neocons argued that the French were getting their just deserts for being elitist-racist cheese-eating surrender-monkeys, no?</p>
<p>A specific article at NRO, effectively cheering the Arab rioters, was posted right here in Chronicles, as I recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hucbald</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-25287</link>
		<dc:creator>Hucbald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-25287</guid>
		<description>13 Bede

&quot;I think that deep down neocons detest Europe. You notice how many of them seem to be cheering its demise. They are just not reporting on it; they are actually celebrating it.&quot;

This is fundamentally incorrect, as any reader of The Corner and other mainstream conservative and libertarian-conservative outlets knows.  Derbyshire would agree with me, and he&#039;d be the first to make your point... if it were true, which it isn&#039;t.

15 Ed Roberts

&quot;The neocon pundits at NRO are traitors and should be tried as such.&quot;

This is, clearly, insane.  You sound like a leftard Huffpot or Kossack.  I&#039;d have quoted more, but you go completely &#039;round the bend in subsequent sentences.

If you REALLY think Corner writers have committed capital offences, you need serious professional help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13 Bede</p>
<p>"I think that deep down neocons detest Europe. You notice how many of them seem to be cheering its demise. They are just not reporting on it; they are actually celebrating it."</p>
<p>This is fundamentally incorrect, as any reader of The Corner and other mainstream conservative and libertarian-conservative outlets knows.  Derbyshire would agree with me, and he'd be the first to make your point... if it were true, which it isn't.</p>
<p>15 Ed Roberts</p>
<p>"The neocon pundits at NRO are traitors and should be tried as such."</p>
<p>This is, clearly, insane.  You sound like a leftard Huffpot or Kossack.  I'd have quoted more, but you go completely 'round the bend in subsequent sentences.</p>
<p>If you REALLY think Corner writers have committed capital offences, you need serious professional help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-25242</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-25242</guid>
		<description>The neocon pundits at NRO are traitors and should be tried as such.  Some well publicized trials of neocons in government service as well as some in influential positions in the MSM, and a few subsequent hangings might show the neocons to the public for what they actually are: traitorous criminals intent on destroying any host country to which they batten themselves.

  In January, the espionage trials for two of their operatives will begin.                                                                                         If the charges prove valid, maybe the first two hangings will occur as a result of those trials.  Unless the consequences of treason are demonstrated, such treason will continue and will expand into the total downfall of the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The neocon pundits at NRO are traitors and should be tried as such.  Some well publicized trials of neocons in government service as well as some in influential positions in the MSM, and a few subsequent hangings might show the neocons to the public for what they actually are: traitorous criminals intent on destroying any host country to which they batten themselves.</p>
<p>  In January, the espionage trials for two of their operatives will begin.                                                                                         If the charges prove valid, maybe the first two hangings will occur as a result of those trials.  Unless the consequences of treason are demonstrated, such treason will continue and will expand into the total downfall of the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bede</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24973</link>
		<dc:creator>Bede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24973</guid>
		<description>N.B.  Michael Chertoff has dual citizenship with Israel, a fact that the mainstream media rarely discusses.  What do you think the fifth column over at NRO would do if the next President appointed a Secretary of Homeland Security with dual citizenship with France?  

Sad, isn&#039;t it?  A country with which we have had long historical ties, a country which has produced a large part of the American population, especially in parts of the Midwest, the neocons shun, and want everyday Americans to transfer their loyalty to a foreign land not even a century old and only tangentially tied to the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N.B.  Michael Chertoff has dual citizenship with Israel, a fact that the mainstream media rarely discusses.  What do you think the fifth column over at NRO would do if the next President appointed a Secretary of Homeland Security with dual citizenship with France?  </p>
<p>Sad, isn't it?  A country with which we have had long historical ties, a country which has produced a large part of the American population, especially in parts of the Midwest, the neocons shun, and want everyday Americans to transfer their loyalty to a foreign land not even a century old and only tangentially tied to the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bede</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24970</link>
		<dc:creator>Bede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24970</guid>
		<description>&quot;Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust.&quot;


I think that deep down neocons detest Europe.  You notice how many of them seem to be cheering its demise.  They are just not reporting on it; they are actually celebrating it. 

It is sad.  The UK and Europe, the ancestral lands for most Americans, are under assault (mostly via third-world immigration), and the patriots that do remain there need at least our moral support, not the type of mockery one reads at NRO.  If Europe falls, the West and Western Man are doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust."</p>
<p>I think that deep down neocons detest Europe.  You notice how many of them seem to be cheering its demise.  They are just not reporting on it; they are actually celebrating it. </p>
<p>It is sad.  The UK and Europe, the ancestral lands for most Americans, are under assault (mostly via third-world immigration), and the patriots that do remain there need at least our moral support, not the type of mockery one reads at NRO.  If Europe falls, the West and Western Man are doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roach</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24697</link>
		<dc:creator>Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24697</guid>
		<description>Roach is, in fact, my last name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roach is, in fact, my last name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24685</link>
		<dc:creator>G.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24685</guid>
		<description>&quot;Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have 
intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust.&quot;

This is a very good point.  

It may seem obvious to others, but for some reason this remark of Mr.... -- er, Roach -- sparked a connection that hadn&#039;t really lit up all that brightly in my mind previously.

The neocon justification for &quot;pre-emptive war&quot; is WWII.  

Or put another way it&#039;s the old, science-fictiony, if-you-could-go-back-in-time-and-kill-Hitler&#039;s-father-before-Adolf-was-conceived idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have<br />
intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust."</p>
<p>This is a very good point.  </p>
<p>It may seem obvious to others, but for some reason this remark of Mr.... -- er, Roach -- sparked a connection that hadn't really lit up all that brightly in my mind previously.</p>
<p>The neocon justification for "pre-emptive war" is WWII.  </p>
<p>Or put another way it's the old, science-fictiony, if-you-could-go-back-in-time-and-kill-Hitler's-father-before-Adolf-was-conceived idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roach</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24383</link>
		<dc:creator>Roach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24383</guid>
		<description>Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust.  Thus we must stand up for democracy, fight for human rights, ignore US interests, and &quot;give people&quot; freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost all neoconservative thinking is based on creating a philosophy that retroactively mean the US would have intervened in Europe earlier than we did and preventing the Holocaust.  Thus we must stand up for democracy, fight for human rights, ignore US interests, and "give people" freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-24048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-24048</guid>
		<description>What I most dislike about these neoconservatives or pro-war conservatives is their unwillingness to debate all issues openly. It&#039;s like reverse PC mentality. &quot;No war? Unamerican!&quot;

These neocons constantly slander everyone a coward, a Leftard, a racist, a Chamberlain or, best of &#039;em all, an antisemite. What&#039;s up with that? Are we debating on the playground? Is re-evaluating or even questioning strategic relations with other nations a thought crime these days? How insane.

That&#039;s no debate, it&#039;s slander, plain and simple. Why has political debate become so politicised, who sets these margins? For once, it&#039;s not the Left. They&#039;re pretty much cornered these days, both here in Europe as in the US. 

Scheuer should be able to express his views and people should have a chance to make their own decisions on the issue of US foreign policy during the next election, without getting labeled racist or unpatriotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I most dislike about these neoconservatives or pro-war conservatives is their unwillingness to debate all issues openly. It's like reverse PC mentality. "No war? Unamerican!"</p>
<p>These neocons constantly slander everyone a coward, a Leftard, a racist, a Chamberlain or, best of 'em all, an antisemite. What's up with that? Are we debating on the playground? Is re-evaluating or even questioning strategic relations with other nations a thought crime these days? How insane.</p>
<p>That's no debate, it's slander, plain and simple. Why has political debate become so politicised, who sets these margins? For once, it's not the Left. They're pretty much cornered these days, both here in Europe as in the US. </p>
<p>Scheuer should be able to express his views and people should have a chance to make their own decisions on the issue of US foreign policy during the next election, without getting labeled racist or unpatriotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/27/sauce-for-the-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-23954</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=338#comment-23954</guid>
		<description>Pardon the ad hominine, but National Review is now run by a pack of mediocre thirty-somethings who have no historical awareness, no real learning, gravitas or perspective (K-Lo, J-Pod).  They view these &quot;intellectual&quot; battles as a fun exercise in cheering for their team (the Yankees), and would rather see the country in ruin that admit they made a mistake.  It is hard for young people to admit they were wrong - I know, I&#039;m their age.  

And as a fellow New Yorker, I know the little game they are playing.  These middle-class boys now get invited to Long Island on summer weekends; they sit in rooms with Carl Ichan without having the talent, accomplishment or financial means of Mr. Icahn; they get to tell their school friends they met Bill Buckley and he made a joke; they laughed.  There is a whole status climbing, class insecurity behind their work.  Having neither the talent for money-making nor serious intellectual accomplishment, they sing the song they think their masters want to hear, further degrading National Review with each word they type.  Mark Steyn, the peasant troubadour, defending his aristocratic benefactor Conrad Black...it&#039;s all so obvious.

The little edifice will come crashing down on them once Mr. Buckley passes away, which is an event I will mourn nevertheless.  Then, free of its mystique and heritage, National Review will fade into a vulgarity the likes of MTV and Bravo TV.  The invites will stop; Graydon Carter will not return calls; the Hearsts will snub them at the Met; the Century Club will call their tabs...and I will smile as I pass the velvet rope and ask the bouncer to please remove them from the Carlyle Room.  Yes, it will be a party worth staying up for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the ad hominine, but National Review is now run by a pack of mediocre thirty-somethings who have no historical awareness, no real learning, gravitas or perspective (K-Lo, J-Pod).  They view these "intellectual" battles as a fun exercise in cheering for their team (the Yankees), and would rather see the country in ruin that admit they made a mistake.  It is hard for young people to admit they were wrong - I know, I'm their age.  </p>
<p>And as a fellow New Yorker, I know the little game they are playing.  These middle-class boys now get invited to Long Island on summer weekends; they sit in rooms with Carl Ichan without having the talent, accomplishment or financial means of Mr. Icahn; they get to tell their school friends they met Bill Buckley and he made a joke; they laughed.  There is a whole status climbing, class insecurity behind their work.  Having neither the talent for money-making nor serious intellectual accomplishment, they sing the song they think their masters want to hear, further degrading National Review with each word they type.  Mark Steyn, the peasant troubadour, defending his aristocratic benefactor Conrad Black...it's all so obvious.</p>
<p>The little edifice will come crashing down on them once Mr. Buckley passes away, which is an event I will mourn nevertheless.  Then, free of its mystique and heritage, National Review will fade into a vulgarity the likes of MTV and Bravo TV.  The invites will stop; Graydon Carter will not return calls; the Hearsts will snub them at the Met; the Century Club will call their tabs...and I will smile as I pass the velvet rope and ask the bouncer to please remove them from the Carlyle Room.  Yes, it will be a party worth staying up for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

