Man i just love your blog, keep the cool posts comin.....

The government's story is a lie from end to end, and they would only lie about it to cover up what they and/or their accomplices did. Now, I don't have to prove that the story is false. They, AND YOU, have provided nothing to prove that it's TRUE. Here are five proofs that neither the feds nor the airlines have never and WILL never show anybody, because they CAN'T:

1) Any video of ANY of the 266 alleged passengers boarding any of the planes in question, at any of the airports in question, on the date in question, much less the "terrorists."

2) One corpse of any of the alleged passengers, recovered and INDEPENDENTLY identified from any of the crash sites, or one piece of their luggage.

3) One frame of video showing a 757 striking the Pentagon, even though the Pentagon is surrounded by out-facing security cameras, and the FBI immediately confiscated film from three video cameras on the other side of the highway, that were pointed right at the section that was hit.

4) Any credit card company records for the alleged purchases of plane tickets and rental cars. (By the way, the idiotic story that they used their real names to do this, and then used FAKE IDs to board the planes, is utter crap. IT ISN'T POSSIBLE!! It's just a repeat of the nonsense that Timothy McVeigh used a fake name to rent the alleged truck, and then used his real name to register at a hotel just up the road.)

5) Any phone company records for the alleged phone calls made from the planes.

How about asking some simple questions that any gumshoe would ask when investigating a crime? Who had the means, motive, and opportunity, and stood to benefit from it? Dr. Roberts addresses this quite nicely, I think.

Sure, lots of people on this planet would have a motive to harm this country, which has invaded countless countries in the last fifty years to increase business opportunites for transnational corporations, as well as turning their people into wage slaves, raping their resources, and subverting their governments. But as to means and opportunity, it's really quite juvenile to think that 19 low-tech losers with carpet knives could pull off a stunt of this magnitude, right under the noses of every "intelligence" agency in this country, while refusing to believe that an unaccountable CIA, with hundreds of billions of off-the-record dollars made from drug running and the like, and a well-documented history of pulling off murderous schemes, and training others to do them, like right this very minute at Fort Benning, Georgia, could possibly be involved.

Let's make this simple. If the "Arabs" didn't get on the planes, the entire story is a lie from start to finish. I am completely unaware of either United or American Airlines filing any claims with their insurance companies over the loss of these "jumbo jets," or any payouts for said claims. Silverstein didn't waste any time cashing in -- what's the problem here?

There were no people on the planes that were involved in this fraud, and they weren't the planes that the government claims they were. And if I know it, then so do those two airlines. You'll never catch my ass flying on either one of them, because they're accessories to the murder of 3,000 people in this country, which has been used as an excuse to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people on the other side of the planet, trash civil liberties, bankrupt the country, and inaugurate endless wars of aggression.

And you all know what needs to be done to every person in the Bush administration -- right now!!

Not being a scientist, I cannot judge the merits of claims on either side, but granted, "official" statistics can never be fully trusted, and not being able to repeat the experiment of the collapse, there will always be a large measure of speculation as to what went on. Not that my opinion of anyone in Washington is any higher regardless of what they did that day. Their reaction to the incident was shameful in the utmost.

"You’re a monarchist? Would you also be an American — and how do you square that circle? I mean no ridicule. At this point I have more faith in Her Majesty the Queen than in George W. Bush …"

I knew you meant no ridicule. The "square" for that "circle" is the classic lie of the "proposition nation." I am loyal to my soil, my family and my community, not to the republic that has usurped its seat of government. I see no reason why one must believe in the ridiculous political ideals of the Enlightenment to be attached to his country... lest we question the ethnicity and nationality of a royalist Frenchman.

As for Her Majesty... well... better than Bush for sure, but still a far cry from Francis II. (By the way, I think just looking at Sophie von und zu Liechtenstein is enough to convert anyone to Jacobitism.)

"... … that those who think the government would bother to orchestrate such a monstrosity for such a purpose have clearly forgotten that the Constitution, if it ever enshrined any decent liberties or political ideals (of which, as an anti-republican/monarchist, I am slightly skeptical), was a dead letter long before these unfortunate events. ..."

Good point, I agree.

Nevertheless, the fact remains that, as a practical and legal matter, our liberties are being shrunk to far beyond whatever the limits were present before "9/11".

We are embroiled in a decrepit alien country's (Israel's) preemptive war, costing us (yes, us, you are paying hefty taxes too) $3 billion a week (!), catalyzing the disintegration of our economy (while already tens of thousands of our soldiers are maimed for life and thousands dead. "Incidentally", close to 1 million Iraqi civilians are dead and their country is back in Stone Age.)

All of the above at the tune of "our" government's screaming "9/11, 9/11!"

If that is not nefarious, I do not know what is.

Ben

You're a monarchist? Would you also be an American -- and how do you square that circle? I mean no ridicule. At this point I have more faith in Her Majesty the Queen than in George W. Bush ...

Also, I would like to point out:

"However, even in the (astronomically unlikely) event that the official version was true, the fact remains that “9/11″ is used by the administration (with the other two branches’ acquiescence) nefariously, most ominously for an Orwellian shortcutting of our Constitution."

... that those who think the government would bother to orchestrate such a monstrosity for such a purpose have clearly forgotten that the Constitution, if it ever enshrined any decent liberties or political ideals (of which, as an anti-republican/monarchist, I am slightly skeptical), was a dead letter long before these unfortunate events.

Great stuff!

Saving to disk.