<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember Diana?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/</link>
	<description>Your home for traditional conservatism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>“... Remember Diana?  ...”

No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“... Remember Diana?  ...”</p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srba Metohijevic</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17600</link>
		<dc:creator>Srba Metohijevic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17600</guid>
		<description>Well,well,well,Prof. Srdjan,

I read it only because I like reading your articles and this time your irony is perfect.

What a pity,the royal family didnt have a member of muslim faith!
Who knows,perhaps with the american democratic means(like bombing of Serbia,Irak,Afganistan............)the late Mr.Dodi could have became The King of UK plus Emirates-more correctly Sultan .

But the democratic Britts,do things more elegantly per car accident-preventing unwanted family?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,well,well,Prof. Srdjan,</p>
<p>I read it only because I like reading your articles and this time your irony is perfect.</p>
<p>What a pity,the royal family didnt have a member of muslim faith!<br />
Who knows,perhaps with the american democratic means(like bombing of Serbia,Irak,Afganistan............)the late Mr.Dodi could have became The King of UK plus Emirates-more correctly Sultan .</p>
<p>But the democratic Britts,do things more elegantly per car accident-preventing unwanted family?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srba Metohijevic</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17598</link>
		<dc:creator>Srba Metohijevic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17598</guid>
		<description>Well,well,well,Prof. Srdjan,

I read it only because I like reading your articles and this time your irony is perfect.

What a pity,the royal family didnt have a member of muslim faith!
Who knows,perhaps with the american democratic means(like bombing of Serbia,Irak,Afganistan............)the late Mr.Dodi could have became The King of UK plus Emirates-more correctly Sultan .

But the democratic Britts,do things more elegantly per car accident-preventing unwanted family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,well,well,Prof. Srdjan,</p>
<p>I read it only because I like reading your articles and this time your irony is perfect.</p>
<p>What a pity,the royal family didnt have a member of muslim faith!<br />
Who knows,perhaps with the american democratic means(like bombing of Serbia,Irak,Afganistan............)the late Mr.Dodi could have became The King of UK plus Emirates-more correctly Sultan .</p>
<p>But the democratic Britts,do things more elegantly per car accident-preventing unwanted family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Leaberry</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17514</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Leaberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17514</guid>
		<description>I am very much in agreement with Robert Peters and Sean Scallon.   

Prince Charles and Lady Diana were a bad match.  She was an urban girl who pretended she enjoyed rural pursuits, not very intelligent, and steeped in the modern mass culture.  Charles was comfortable as a rural tinkerer with intellectual pretentions but very much outside the mainstream culture.  As a 31 year old man, he should have known that 19 year old Diana was not a good mate.  In days of yore, both would have done their duty, remained married, and made the best of the situation for their country, their children and the House of Windsor.  Instead, the world witnessed a Royal soap opera.

It seems likely that within the next ten years, the Prince of Wales will become Regent- Queen Elizabeth will not abdicate for health reasons.  When it comes, the reign of King Charles III will be about as brief as King Edward VIII&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very much in agreement with Robert Peters and Sean Scallon.   </p>
<p>Prince Charles and Lady Diana were a bad match.  She was an urban girl who pretended she enjoyed rural pursuits, not very intelligent, and steeped in the modern mass culture.  Charles was comfortable as a rural tinkerer with intellectual pretentions but very much outside the mainstream culture.  As a 31 year old man, he should have known that 19 year old Diana was not a good mate.  In days of yore, both would have done their duty, remained married, and made the best of the situation for their country, their children and the House of Windsor.  Instead, the world witnessed a Royal soap opera.</p>
<p>It seems likely that within the next ten years, the Prince of Wales will become Regent- Queen Elizabeth will not abdicate for health reasons.  When it comes, the reign of King Charles III will be about as brief as King Edward VIII's.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Scallon</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17458</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Scallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17458</guid>
		<description>Watching the movie &quot;The Queen&quot; will give you a good impression of how mad Great Britain went over Diana&#039;s death and how the Royal Family was basically bullied into joining the mob mourning her death by a tabloid press eager to shift the blame from its own culpability in Diana&#039;s death to a royal family that tired to retain its dignity while everyone else wanted to slobber publicly over a celebrity. Diana&#039;s death and the reaction to it is important only in the sense that it was the moment that Britian lost its greatness and became &quot;Americanized.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the movie "The Queen" will give you a good impression of how mad Great Britain went over Diana's death and how the Royal Family was basically bullied into joining the mob mourning her death by a tabloid press eager to shift the blame from its own culpability in Diana's death to a royal family that tired to retain its dignity while everyone else wanted to slobber publicly over a celebrity. Diana's death and the reaction to it is important only in the sense that it was the moment that Britian lost its greatness and became "Americanized."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17189</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17189</guid>
		<description>I dont know about British royals turning Moslem, but George Bush is clearly a de facto Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know about British royals turning Moslem, but George Bush is clearly a de facto Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas G.P. MOSES</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17130</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas G.P. MOSES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17130</guid>
		<description>Right and wrong have come to mean nothing to a royal house that illegally usurped the throne.  Now this has disseminated down into the general populace to the point where Britain and America are unrecognizable even to those of us born in the 1980&#039;s.

Credit must be given, however, for the Prince&#039;s earnest efforts to reverse the aesthetic and social evils wrought by modernist architecture.  Shame on those who pressured him into caving to decadent opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right and wrong have come to mean nothing to a royal house that illegally usurped the throne.  Now this has disseminated down into the general populace to the point where Britain and America are unrecognizable even to those of us born in the 1980's.</p>
<p>Credit must be given, however, for the Prince's earnest efforts to reverse the aesthetic and social evils wrought by modernist architecture.  Shame on those who pressured him into caving to decadent opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17088</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17088</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Prince and the Princess failed in their duty to the Christ in whose name they took their marriage oath, regardless of where their hearts were; in their duty to the British people as very public symbols of their values and aspirations; in their duty to their families, for they like all of us are called to honor our parents; in their duty to their children as well as to their distant offspring; and in their duty to one another.&quot; [etc.] - robert m. peters

Great post above! Sir if more people spoke as you do, I wouldn&#039;t have to say much at all [fortunately]. I too am a failure sadly, attempting to make my amends. Part of that is to recognize who stayed the course appropriately, and give them their just recompense. At least some of us yet remember the difference between right and wrong. Others more or less do though need their memories jogged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Prince and the Princess failed in their duty to the Christ in whose name they took their marriage oath, regardless of where their hearts were; in their duty to the British people as very public symbols of their values and aspirations; in their duty to their families, for they like all of us are called to honor our parents; in their duty to their children as well as to their distant offspring; and in their duty to one another." [etc.] - robert m. peters</p>
<p>Great post above! Sir if more people spoke as you do, I wouldn't have to say much at all [fortunately]. I too am a failure sadly, attempting to make my amends. Part of that is to recognize who stayed the course appropriately, and give them their just recompense. At least some of us yet remember the difference between right and wrong. Others more or less do though need their memories jogged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17071</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17071</guid>
		<description>Taking time out from the hysterical ranting of the screwballs, whackos, dingbats or whatever, the Islamic site Dr Trifkovic links to, Submission.org, is very interesting and informative. It has a section, for example, on terrorism and jihad which sets out, with the help of extensive quotes from the Koran, why Islam opposes killing. The presentation reminds me of several Catholic sites on which Submission may well be based. I&#039;ve added it to my favourites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking time out from the hysterical ranting of the screwballs, whackos, dingbats or whatever, the Islamic site Dr Trifkovic links to, Submission.org, is very interesting and informative. It has a section, for example, on terrorism and jihad which sets out, with the help of extensive quotes from the Koran, why Islam opposes killing. The presentation reminds me of several Catholic sites on which Submission may well be based. I've added it to my favourites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/09/08/remember-diana/comment-page-1/#comment-17060</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=310#comment-17060</guid>
		<description>What is the point of making a post about a wealthy non-entity who spread her legs for a fat disgusting billionaire muslim arab? You have got to be kidding me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the point of making a post about a wealthy non-entity who spread her legs for a fat disgusting billionaire muslim arab? You have got to be kidding me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

