Your home for traditional conservatism.

The War Criminal in the Living Room

Paul Craig RobertsThe media are silent, Congress is absent, and Americans are distracted as George W. Bush openly prepares aggression against Iran.

U.S. Navy aircraft carrier strike forces are deployed off Iran.

U.S. Air Force jets and missile systems are deployed in bases in countries bordering or near to Iran.

U.S. B-2 stealth bombers have been refitted to carry 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs.

The U.S. government is financing terrorist and separatist groups within Iran.

U.S. Special Forces teams are conducting terrorist operations inside Iran.

U.S. war doctrine has been altered to permit first-strike nuclear attack on Iran and other non-nuclear countries.

Bush's war threats against Iran have intensified during the course of this year. The American people are being fed a repeat of the lies used to justify naked aggression against Iraq.

Bush is too self-righteous to see the dark humor in his denunciations of Iran for threatening "the security of nations everywhere" and of the Iraqi resistance for "a vision that rejects tolerance, crushes all dissent and justifies the murder of innocent men, women and children in the pursuit of political power."

Those are precisely the words that most of the world applies to Bush and his Brownshirt administration. The Pew Foundation's world polls show that despite all the American and Israeli propaganda against Iran, the United States and Israel are regarded as no less threats to world stability than demonized Iran.

Bush has discarded habeas corpus and the Geneva Conventions, justified torture and secret trials, damned critics as anti-American, and is responsible, according to Information Clearing House, for over 1 million deaths of Iraqi civilians, which puts Bush high on the list of mass murderers of all time. The vast majority of "kills" by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan are civilians.

Now Bush wants to murder more. We have to kill Iranians "over there," Bush says, "before they come over here." There is no possibility that Iranians or any Muslims who have no air force, no navy and no modern military technology are going to "come over here," and no indication that they plan to do so. The Muslims are disunited and have been for centuries. That is what makes them vulnerable to colonial rule. If Muslims were united, the United States would already have lost its army in Iraq. Indeed, it would not have been able to put an army in Iraq.

Meanwhile, the U.S. media focus on whether Republican Sen. Larry Craig is a homosexual or has offended gays by denying to be one of them. The run-up for the public's attention is why a South Carolina beauty queen cannot answer a simple question about why her generation is unable to find the United States on a map.

The war criminal is in the living room, and no official notice is taken of the fact.

Lacking U.S. troops with which to invade Iran, the Bush administration has decided to bomb Iran "back into the stone age." Punishing air and missile attacks have been designed not merely to destroy Iran's nuclear energy projects, but also to destroy the public infrastructure, the economy and the ability of the government to function.

Encouraged by the indifference of both the American media and Christian churches to the massive casualties inflicted on Iraqi civilians, the Bush administration will not be deterred by the prospect of its air attacks inflicting massive casualties on Iranian civilians. Last summer, the Bush administration demonstrated to the entire world its total disdain for Muslim life when Bush supported Israel's month-long air attack on Lebanese civilian infrastructure and civilian residences. President Bush blocked the attempt by the rest of the world to halt the gratuitous murder of Lebanese civilians and infrastructure destruction. Clearly, turning the Muslim Middle East into a wasteland is the Bush policy. For Bush, civilian casualties are a non-issue. Hegemony uber alles.

The Bush administration has made its war plans for attacking Iraq and positioned its forces without any prior approval from Congress. The "unitary executive" obviously doesn't believe that an attack on Iran requires the approval of Congress. By its absence and quietude, Congress seems to agree that it has no role in the decision.

In the improbable event that Congress were to make any fuss about Bush's decision to attack yet another country, the State Department has devised legalistic cover: simply declare Iran's military to be a "terrorist organization" and go to war under the cover of the existing resolution.

The "Iran issue" has been created by the Bush administration, not by Iran. Iran, like many other countries, has a nuclear energy program to which it is entitled as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency have found no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran.

The Bush administration has brushed away this fact, which should be determining, just as the Bush administration brushed away the fact that weapons inspectors reported, prior to Bush's invasion of Iraq, that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The Bush administration managed to disrupt the work of the pesky International Atomic Energy Agency weapons inspectors in Iran. Iran has been working successfully with the IAEA and has achieved what a senior IAEA official recently described as a milestone agreement. The Bush administration instantly went to work to discredit the agreement and unleashed its new lapdog, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, to threaten "the bombing of Iran."

The Bush administration's position is legally untenable and is really nothing but a contrived excuse to start another war. Bush claims that Iran, alone among all the signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, must be denied its right under the pact to develop nuclear energy, because Iran, alone among all the other signatories, will be the only country able to deceive the IAEA inspectors and develop nuclear weapons. Therefore, Iran must be denied its rights under the agreement.

Bush's position on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is as legally untenable as his position on every other issue—the Geneva Conventions, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, habeas corpus, the constitutional separation of powers and presidential signing statements that he cavalierly attaches to new laws in order to override the legislative power of Congress. Bush's position is that the meaning of laws and treaties varies with his needs of the moment.

Bush has declared himself to be the "decider." The "decider" decides whether Americans have any rights under the Constitution and whether Iran has any rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. As the "decider" has decided that Iran has no such rights, the "decider" decides whether to attack Iran. No one else has any say about it. The people's representatives are just so much chaff in the wind.

Whatever form of government Bush is operating under, it is far outside an accountable constitutional democratic government. Bush has transitioned America to Caesarism, and even if Bush leaves office in January 2009, the powers he has accumulated in the executive will remain.

Unless Bush and Cheney are impeached and convicted, there is no prospect of the U.S. Congress and federal judiciary ever again being co-equal branches of government.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

11 Responses »

  1. Paul:
    I am a 62 yr old retired teacher/administrator. I have watched the Democrats go from honest to cowardly. When the real brown shirts come and drag guys like you out onto the streets I will not care. Twenty years ago I would have died for people that I disagreed with, but now? You no more care for my children than the rest of the tactless, mis-informed, hollow, morally currupt partisans calling themselves Democrats. You agenda has gone from caring to socialist in one generation. Shame on you and all the other apologists for behavioral dementia called progressivism. Give Rosie a kiss and while your at it, my ass too.

  2. A well-done indictment. I would hasten to add, since we have seen the Nuremberg Analogy in play a few times, they did hang Jules Streicher, thus the title and subject of this column is relevant on several levels.

    LarryG;

    It's true, we conservatives don't care about your children.

  3. Doubtless when Hitler invaded Austria and Czechoslavakia, most Germans thought he was a nice man doing the right thing. Just like the American public and the Boy Decider. The masses don't usually figure things out until too late---the politicians never, since politicians are not in to figuring things out except what aggrandizes them personally.

  4. A Boy Decider and his almighty Jewish-Israeli Lobby AIPAC hold sway. One phone call from the Lobby (not from Bush) to Speaker Pelosi and making Bush come to Congress if he 'decides' to terrorize and kill more millions in Iran, (never mind set the wheels in motion to impeach him - for what he has already done in Iraq), was chucked into the circular file (the waste-basket) by the 'intrepid' Pelosi. What a joke, we're ruled from Jerusalem vis a vis an american moron. Bad president, bad lobby - bad robots -

  5. As Ezra Pound might say:

    Welcome to Yankee Judea...

  6. "Shame on you and all the other apologists for behavioral dementia called progressivism."

    LarryG, do you have the slightest idea what you are talking about? Paul Craig Roberts is not a Democrat or a progressive. Try to inform yourself at least a little bit before you spout off.

  7. (Re comment 4)

    Unfortunately, all very, very true.

    Check the highly informative Google video documentary

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7999343597466477342&q=stringpullers&total=21&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

    Speaking of ruling the world by proxy ... scary...

  8. Paul,

    Much that you have written here is accurate with regard to the current administration and congress. I differ with you in your bilthe assessment of the threat from Iran to the West and to America in particular.

    The one dimensional application of state power since 911 has in fact caused tremendous loss of life. When last I checked, a nation state has other elements of national power that can, and often are more devasting to their target than military force. Oh, wait a minute. I forget, the open boarders free trade crowd have eliminated all the other levers of national power in the pursuit of profits.

    I have served this country under-arms for thrity years. What has transpired these last six years is the willful discarding of our traditions, history, constitution and the creation of an awful future of our children.

  9. LarryG apparently thinks that Paul Roberts is a democrat because he is critical of W's splendid little war.

  10. "... The dumbing down of US culture and education has led to the elevation of the lowest common denominator at the expense of common sense and reason. ..."

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II11Ak03.html

    This entire "Dispatch from America" by Delasantellis is excellent...

    Two samples:

    "...

    On August 24, Miss Teen South Carolina, Lauren Caitlin Upton, in the Miss Teen USA beauty pageant ... was asked: "Recent polls have shown a fifth of Americans can't locate the US on a world map. Why do you think this is?"

    Without missing a beat, Upton replied: "I personally believe that Americans are unable to do so because, uhmmm, some people out there in our nation don't have maps and uh, I believe that our, I, education like such as uh, South Africa, and uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should, uhhh, our education over here in the US should help the US, uh, should help South Africa, it should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future, for us."
    No matter how gruesome this reads as text, it's infinitely worse on video, assuming that you're one of the planet's few sentient beings who have not seen the video on YouTube.
    ...
    Still, we must all be grateful to Upton. In fewer than 100 words, she has produced the most lucid, coherent and internally consistent justification ever stated for America's continuing involvement in Iraq.

    ..."

    "...

    In 2004, the online magazine Salon published an interview with Yoshi Tsurumi, Bush's first-year macroeconomics professor at the Harvard Business School during the 1973-74 academic year...

    Bush ... frequently came to class late, and rarely participated in class discussions, choosing instead to sit up in a back row of the class wearing his Texas Air National Guard (Tsurumi reports that Bush bragged that his father's political connections got him out of the requirement of full service in the Texas ANG) bomber jacket spitting chewing tobacco into a paper cup.

    "Yup, one of those." I, and probably every other teacher, groaned upon first reading that. Every class has one of those. This one went on to be president of the United States.

    Bush scored in the lowest 10% of his class; as for his skills in, as the grade-school report cards put it, "getting along with others", Tsurumi reported that even there young Bush needed some remedial help.

    "He showed pathological lying habits and was in denial when challenged on his prejudices and biases. He would even deny saying something he just said 30 seconds ago. He was famous for that. Students jumped on him; I challenged him. When asked to explain a particular comment, Bush would respond, 'Oh, I never said that.'"

    In other words, even then he showed precisely the attributes Americans really want in their president.

    ..."

  11. P.S.

    Oh, I almost forgot the touché :

    "...

    In the same manner in which Ronald Reagan appointed Jeanne Kirkpatrick US ambassador to the United Nations to reflect his conservative views, perhaps Bush will do the same with Upton; more so than the ineffectually combative John Bolton, at last Bush might finally have someone at the UN who can best explain the delicate nuance of his foreign policy.

    ..."