Half a Billion “Americans”?
The latest report from the Center for Immigration Studies on how immigration may impact the future size of America’s population has been released. Their findings are based on the Census Bureau projections, and show that if immigration continues at current levels, the U.S. population will increase from 301 million today to 468 million in 2060—a 167 million (or 56 percent) increase. New immigrants and their descendants will account for 105 million (or 63 percent) of that increase.
The report says that, at the moment, approximately 1.6 million legal and illegal immigrants settle in the United States each year and 350,000 leave, resulting in net immigration of 1.25 million. The total projected growth of 167 million would exceed the current total population of Central America (41 million), the Caribbean (37 million) and Egypt (79 million). The 105 million from immigration by itself is equal to the present population of Mexico.
Even those staggering figures are based on the assumption that immigration levels will remain static. Net immigration has been increasing for the past half-century, however, and there are no signs that the trend is changing. If it continues, the increase caused by immigration may well be higher than the projected 105 million—taking us easily to an America of half a billion people five decades from now.
On the other hand, if the annual level of net immigration was reduced to 300,000—which can be done if the political will is present—future immigration would add 25 million people to the population by 2060. That would be some 80 million fewer than the current level would add.
One of the most interesting findings of the report is that immigration does not have an impact on the overall aging of this country’s population—which is a key argument used by the proponents of open-door policy. In reality,
At the current level of net immigration (1.25 million a year), 61 percent of the nation’s population will be of working age (15 to 66) in 2060, compared to 60 percent if net immigration were reduced to 300,000 a year. If net immigration was doubled to 2.5 million a year it would raise the working-age share of the population by one additional percentage point, to 62 percent, by 2060. But that level of immigration would create a U.S. population of 573 million, double its size in the 2000 Census.
The report does not tackle the national security aspect of the problem. The number of Muslim immigrants in the united States is growing more than twice as fast as the already rampant total. Growth of overall immigration since 1970 has been 300 percent, but growth of immigration from the Middle East over the same period has been 700 percent—from under 200,000 in 1970 to 1.5 million in 2000. In 2005, more people from Muslim countries became legal permanent U.S. residents—almost 100,000—than in any year in the previous two decades. More than 40,000 of them were admitted legally in 2005, the highest annual number since the terrorist attacks, according to data on 22 countries provided by the Department of Homeland Security.
On current form, in 2010 the expected number of immigrants from the Middle East alone will exceed 2,500,000. Lavishly financed by Saudi and other Middle Eastern oil money, an intricate jihadist infrastructure has come into being to cater to this large and growing community. The number of mosques and Islamic centers stands at around two thousand and keeps growing. The total number of mosques increased 42 percent between 1990 and 2000, compared with a 12 percent average increase for the evangelical Protestant denominations, and a two percent average increase among old-line Protestant, Roman Catholic and Orthodox groups.
The figures for immigration from the Middle East are already matched, and are likely to be exceeded, by the number of Muslim immigrants from the Indian Sub-Continent (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh). Currently Muslims account for one-tenth of all naturalizations, and their birth rates exceed those of any other significant immigrant group.
Far from enhancing America’s “diversity,” the coming deluge threatens to impose a numbing Thirld-World sameness, to eradicate the remnants of this country’s identity, and to demolish what survives of her special character. On current form, not only will English-speaking Americans of European origin become a minority in their own country half a century from now, but they will share an increasingly overpopulated, polluted, lumpenproleterized, culturally unrecognizable country with tens of millions of actual or potential jihadists and their accomplices, aiders and abettors.
Whether this colossally criminal idiocy can be stopped, and how, is open to doubt. The cultural-Marxist ruling class sees self-annihilation of peoples with a historical memory and a cultural identity as the key to its revolutionary project. The founders of the United States rebelled against King George for sins far lighter than those of which our rulers are culpable.
241 Responses »
Trackbacks
- Eunomia · The Roundup
- Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture | Your Home for Traditional Conservatism » Alien Country, Indeed
Entries(RSS)
Come, listen, all you gals and boys, I’m just from Tuckyhoe;
I’m gwine to sing a little song, My name’s Jim Crow.
Chorus: Wheel about, an’ turn about, an’ do jis so;
Eb’ry time I wheel about, I jump Jim Crow.
I went down to de river, I didn’t mean to stay,
But there I see so many gals, I couldn’t get away.
I’m rorer on de fiddle, an’ down in ole Virginny,
Dey say I play de skientific, like massa Pagganninny.
I cut so many munky shines, I dance de galloppade;
An’ w’en I done, I res’ my head, on shubble, hoe or spade.
I met Miss Dina Scrub one day, I gib her sich a buss;
An’ den she turn an’ slap my face, an’ make a mighty fuss.
De udder gals dey ‘gin to fight, I tel’d dem wait a bit;
I’d hab dem all, jis one by one, as I tourt fit.
I wip de lion ob de west, I eat de alligator;
I put more water in my mouf, den boil ten load ob ‘tator.
De way dey bake de hoe cake, Virginny nebber tire;
Dey put de doe upon de foot, an’ stick ‘em in de fire.
Jeff,
Is neither an option? Because in reality the true answer would be neither. If there are sides to be taken in a struggle, then it may well be the Christian one sides with, but it is the white who can potentially melt into the American nation most easily. Though of course if he's a firm Marxist, he's likely more trouble than he's worth.
I've a question for you: a man's child is raised as a non-Mestizo (and 100% European) blue-eyed Mexican Marxist fresh from Tiajuana and a random stranger's child is an anglophone, patriotic, hard-working Christian, whose grandparents immigrated from India.
If the parents of the latter pass away, and the former child is recovered and taken back to Dixie, whom does the parent have a duty to help?
The same is true of your kinsman.
---
Is the concept of the nation state so terribly evil? It is the most durable option, and though I look forward to the next world I'm in no hurry to destroy this one. WWII be damned; nation-states may tend to fight, but alternatives cannot resist suicide.
Jeff,
Ah, I see you're not opposing the nation-state but the "pure" nation-state. Well, I'll say that over time a nation will become pure if it doesn't allow in immigration. Though a nation can absorb some immigrants, they will likely weaken it (especially now that we have genetic testing.) British nationalism seems bolstered by the claim that the majority of its nation shares a heritage of so many thousands of years. America has taken in more foreigners than it can absorb, but secession is an alternative to expulsion.
Let me give you another example of LEGAL IMMIGRANT hindu violence against Euro-Ameriacn men.
Several years back a Euro-American Man of Irish descent was forced to trian his LEGAL IMMIGRANT hindu replacement from India at the California bank he worked at as a computer programmer. A week later he shot himself in the head in the parking lot of this San Francisco bank.
Every year, LEGAL HINDU immigrants are allowed to comit thousands of acts of aggression against Euro-American men.
How much longer are Euro-American Men supose to put up with hindu aggression within the borders of America?
It is happenning because of the passage of the 1965 immigration refrom act which is bringing about a massive racial transformation of America.
Dr. Trafica left something very important out of his post. Post 1965-non-white LEGAL IMMIGRANTS are not innocent bystanders. They are actively involved in perpetuating post-1965 LEGAL IMMIGRATION policy. This makes post 1965 non-white LEGAL IMMIGRANTS guilty of actively participating in the complete economic and racial dispossession of the majority Euro-American population.
It is not uncommon for LEGAL IMMIGRANT muslim immigrants -right off the boat- to get involved with muslim PAC groups-within days of arriving to America. (front page story WSJ a few years back)
Frank @ 203: Not sure I understand your question? Which uncultured newborn should one raise?
If I have two innocents, I would say "both".
Frank @ 204: Not sure what you mean by pure or impure either. If we cease immigration we will, over time, become pure? Sorry, maybe it's just that I haven't had coffee.
Wheeler: Don't ignore the question.
I'll give you that some, maybe most, South Asian immigrants are hostile and dangerous, but it's a serious question: will you tolerate those who are not hostile to you?
You have yet to meet one, but would you?
I'm sorry to hear of anyone committing suicide but to describe an Irish American killing himself because he was "forced" to train his hindu replacement as an example of hindu aggression is way beyond ludicrous. If this represents the qualities of "European" man then that "race" better get an infusion of alien "blood" very quickly if they are to survive. Anyone who does not want to train their replacement can just quit their job early and start looking for the next one. Some of my kids have lost jobs several times and always bounced back to find new and better ones. Happily they were able to overcome the weakness of their Irish/German/Anglo-Saxon/French genes. I might also note that most Americans consider hindus to be among the wimpiest of the wimpy. But apparently they have our resident white nationalists terrified of their aggression.
"... Anyone who does not want to train their replacement can just quit their job early and start looking for the next one. ..."
Of course he can quit on his own.
However, the problem is that he then forfeits the unemployment benefits!
That is the law.
I believe that the present maximum benefit rate is close to $600 per week (depends on your earnings), and lasts for a very minimum of six months (State) and a maximum of one year and three months (including State and Federal extensions, depending in which time of year you start, which State you live in, and other factors).
Thus, unless he is independently wealthy (or is very young, or has a very nice daddy such as apparently you are), he cannot afford to just quit.
For those of you who are not familiar with how it works in the United States, unemployment insurance is not "welfare", but _insurance_, where the mandatory premiums are deducted from each of your paychecks by your employer, by law. It is your money.
P.S.
Of course, while living on unemployment benefits, one must look for another job, that is the idea.
However, the job search may take many months - or even years - a tough proposition if you are older, or are very specialized, or - and that is the point of this discussion thread, isn't it? - you are competing with skilled immigrants in your profession...
J, the point of the discussion was not the way unemployment benefits work nor the necessity of competing with skilled immigrants in your profession. It was whether or not being hired to replace a native constitutes "aggression" on the part of the immigrant. If this is true, then being hired to replace anyone constitutes aggression on the part of the new hire. Note that the fearful Mr. Wheeler concedes that the hindu was acting legally. The point also is whether or not committing suicide within a week is an appropriate response to losing your job and whether terrified ranting and raving is an appropriate response to the presence of hindus in our society.
The company I worked for hired dozens of hindu programmers on H-1 visas in the run-up to Y2K and then released them all once they had done their job. None of our native programmers were replaced. I have known a lot of white programmers over the years and not known one who lost his job to an immigrant or expressed any fear of hindus. Clearly I must know some more intelligent and less hysterical white people than Mr. Wheeler does.
I regret to note that Mr. Brian Wheeler is correct here. A mere choice of term "aggression", related to personal perception (and who can blame one who is on the receiving end?), is of course irrelevant.
At essence is the large employment picture we are facing, a brutal competition for jobs (bare survival), not only with the outside world ("globalization") - but now within our very own borders (due to ill controlled immigration). It certainly is not about "winning an argument", but rather about the pigeonhole principle, with less pigeonholes than pigeons. Anyone who has been there knows.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
P.S.
On second thought, the term "aggression" is fully warranted here, very much so indeed, if the word is entitled to bear its meaning.
J
I suupose that when slave views the institution of slavery as an act of agression against his or her humanity it is a personal obsevation and therefor irrelevant. The same can be said for the WASP wage slaves in carniege's stell mills. Right
That should read Carniege and Fricks steal mills.
Depriving Native Born White Americans the benefits of a severe labor scarcity, which the 1965 immigration reform act has surely done,has transfered power completly away from Native Born White Workers to Mr. Higdons cockroach friends in mamgement.
The goal is to drive Native Born White Americans into wage slavery..which exist on a conituum with chatel slavery. And as the Southern apologists for slavery-Fitzshugh-argued persuavisly can be actually worse than chatel slavery.
For more examples of hindu LEGAL IMMIGRANT agression agianst Native Born White workers, check at the Victims Wall over at Brenda Walkers website.
Only a fool would deny that opposition to the importation of hindu LEGAL IMMIGRANT tech scab workers is growing with each passing year.
I have sisters who are RNs. Every time Native Born White Nurses attetmpt to wage a succesfull strike for higher wages and better working conditions, management goes out and brings in the phillipino and hindu strike breaking job shops that are located in NJ. This is most defintely an act of aggresion by post-1965 non-white LEGAL immigrants against Native Born White Women.
"... I suppose that when slave views the institution of slavery as an act of aggression against his or her humanity it is a personal observation and therefor irrelevant. The same can be said for the WASP wage slaves in Carnegie’s steel mills. Right ..."
Mr. Wheeler, as I said, I do stand corrected, your use of the term aggression is quite appropriate.
Trying to avoid offending the absent sensibilities of "the other party" here is what is moot. One meets many likes of them in course of one's professional life. The point of my earlier posts was to inform the general public, certainly not enter "an argument", I leave that to John Cleese.
Incidentally, your prior entomological classification of the breed is highly accurate indeed.
J.
One mo' time. It should read Carniege and Frick's Steel Mills. Though "steal mills" mat not be too bad of a mistake,for Carnige and Frick's Steel Mills did in fact steal something very important from Northeastern WASP mill workers. Carnige and Frick's Steel Mills robbed Northeastern WASP mill workers of their lives.
May they both burn in hell for an eternity along with Ronald REagan, GEorge W Bush and the Clinton power couple.
Jeff,
what do you think race is but a separated gene pool? We're all descended from Adam and Eve. The further back the common heritage of the nation, the stronger its ties to its ancestral traditions including its religion. When the Atlantians mixed, they lost their way and became corrupt; I read it as not so much that the alien blood was inferior but that it didn't identify as strongly as being Atlantian and also perhaps identified with the alien component. You've never heard anyone speak of the "myth of common origin" that binds a nation? If a "nation" can trace its ancestry back 40K years but the bulk of the population can't trace back further than 20K years, that first 20K years isn't really the heritage of the same nation. It won't identify closely with it as a result.
Whites split off what, 40K or 80K years ago? I read all sorts of numbers and the truth is we're all but clueless (the numbers seem all but unfounded.) Well, give them another 40K years, and you've got yourself a more unique race. If a few Neanderthals slipped in in the past, you can't pick them out now. Racial traits are nothing more than biological traditions. The culture or environment or random chance chose a different evolutionary path (we do "evolve" in a sense though complex genes cannot come into being - the reality of evolution must be reconciled with popular Christianity, btw. And reality does not contradict the truth.)
Resources permit you to only raise one. You have a duty to your blood relation - your child.
If you lived among the starving in Africa, you wouldn't choose to help, over your own child, random children, even those smarter or more beautiful. Anyway, if seeking to do your duty you'd probably seek out to help those of your community and nation for the most part; they'll always need help.
Anyway, if taken too far it becomes absurd: there are only so many resources available. But politically race within a nation is significant. Also, the nation is a gene pool; it's an organism though each part must spend most of its time and effort looking after its own while not significantly harming the nation and ideally helping it a little here and there - voluntarily working for its betterment as well as for the religion, including sending out missionaries.
I welcome independent thinking, and I don't pretend to be a sage. Hopefully disagreements are not the result of misunderstandings though. With that I'm off to sleep.
Regarding tech work,
I used to be a computer engineer. Why did I change majors (have since graduated)? It's not because I had any trouble with engineering. It's because the wages dropped.
Regarding Hindus,
I met many Indians of a variety of sects, including Islam. I tended to get along with them very well for whatever reason. Heh, one Muslim Indian introduced me to David Duke, though I'm not a fan of Duke I think it's funny that an Indian Muslim reads him. Admittedly the Muslim didn't think much of Jews, but I'm not Jewish so that didn't bother me one bit. We simply found other things to speak of.
Regarding mixed marriages,
God has a purpose for each of us. Despite it being problematic for some, I'm not about to alter a political ideology that seems to provide oasis of orderly freedom amidst the chaos and slavery of the world. However God loves all of his children, and there's no reason a child of mixed ancestry can't serve the Lord, be happy, and be saved.
To read about more acts a hindu aggression against against Native Born White Americans go the Victims Wall over at Brenda Walker's web site. REad and weep as they say.
Right after 9/11, there was a front page story in the NYT about how almost immediately after 9/11, cockroach H-1 B visa LEGAL IMMIGRANTS were recieving annoymous hate email from their Native Born White co-workers. It got so bad, that tech companies went out and hired clinical psychologists to provide therapy to their little hindu darlings.
This morning a cockraoach hindu couple cut ahead of me took the parking space I was waiting for. I took great pleasure in telling them to go back to the toilet bowl India.
"... I took great pleasure in telling them to go back to the toilet bowl India. ..."
FLUSHHHHH!!!..........
P.S.
Apropos of that "most numerous world democracy":
http://animal.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060327/cockroach.html
Brian, Indians are an extremely diverse lot. I find southern Italians to tend to be quite rude and inconsiderate, but I don't expect every European to be the same way.
Anyway, you seem certain about what you don't like. But it might be productive for Americans in general (I don't know you well enough to comment on you directly of course) to ponder on just what they wish to move towards.
Is conservatism grumpy, unfocused anger at the modern world? Or does it offer an alternative and hope for the future? If we love our people, our cultural roots, and our religion, we should be able to derive a goal to strive for.
If liberalism is the ideology of suicide, perhaps conservatives should counter it with a reason for the West to live.
If movements can only be built on greed and hate, then they'll always be hijacked and misdirected. We don't need coalitions of fellow haters and greedies; we need a movement towards a clear goal. We need to create not destroy. If modernism is all about destruction and short term individual pleasures at the expense of others and those who come after, then grumpy old men who do nothing but offer criticisms of the moderns are little better than modernists.
"... Indians are an extremely diverse lot ..."
You got at least one thing right. From
http://animal.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060327/cockroach.html
:
"There are at least 4,000 known species of cockroach."
And, as you say:
"For cockroaches, it seems, cooperation comes naturally."
Frank
You are missing the crucial point. The cockroaches among our own kind import the cockroaches from the toilet bowl India to terrorize White Americans into accepting dehumanizing wage slavery. If they didn't import these scab worker cockraoches from India, poet would be transfered back to White workers away from the bossman.
I really enjoyed telling these two hindu LEGAL IMMIGRANT cockroaches to F OFF
I don't hate the Hindus living in India.
I understand quite well how they artificially lower our wages and encourage Americans to pursue other occupations. And the posts of these skilled immigrants comes with a fair degree of influence; will they act for their personal gain at the expense of America? I not only want the inflow stopped; I want them shipped home as well though, perhaps in a dishonest manner, I rarely voice such sentiments.
The Indians I've befriended all knew I had nothing against them personally, but that I did wish for them to leave. It's a political problem though; it's up to our masters to decide. Massa Bush says they stay.
---
Quote taken from Richard Weaver. "Two Types of American Individualism." The Southern Essays of Richard Weaver
Quoted clause from Randolph's second and true will:
Later quote directly from Richard Weaver:
Two points:
1. It's interesting that Randolph specified for his freed slaves to be settled in another state or territory.
2. The free men of Mercer County were able to refuse these immigrants. America has become so centralised that we are not free to do the same. To emphasise that we are not free: we are practically slaves, and we know little of how to take care of ourselves - look at the US savings rate. If aliens are to be expelled using the current system, it must be with the use of some terrible state power which cannot be trusted.
The plan seems to be to make the problem so severe in America that in cannot be righted. I think those who wish to see America destroyed do not have a vision of the future; they simply wish America destroyed, especially if there's an easy buck to be made in the process. Love of nation is "racist," religion is deception; that is the view of the modern. I wonder if the existence of nationalism and faith don't remind them of their emptiness; they are perhaps envious as well as afraid of what they do not understand. So, with that the enemy is understood somewhat.
While the federal government and the current American elites are to be marginalized, Americans should be wary of populism and libertarianism. Such movements might be useful (politically expedient), but they shouldn't be embraced. Also, I recall reading in Chronicles that the US state is to be defended against globalism, though ideally it would be decentralised. So, the federal government too might be useful in defense against globalism, but again not to be embraced.
I often wonder what others truly believe. It's fine to be dishonest with the enemy, but I think too many end up fooling themselves and their own. A true right wing movement should be honest with itself. It's the nature of the enemy to manipulate for individual gain. Anyway so to those who reject what I say, I challenge you to present something better.
---
Though I again shouldn't tell you what to do, I'll just say a Christian shouldn't hate. I suspect I want them out as strongly as do you though.
I guess road rage can be therapy. I'm happy it made you feel good to tell off that hindu couple, Mr. Wheeler. I wouldn't want you to commit suicide over losing a parking space to hindu aggression.
Re Dr. Duke
Exposing the liars is all that matters. If you don't listen to all sides, you are not seeking truth. Dr. David Duke's world wide best selling book "Jewish Supremacism" is free to download at The Pirate Bay dot com in MP3 format. While this free spoken word book is several hours long, it is broken up into individual files each about 30 minutes in length. Listen to it during lunch and see if you or your friends can find any lies at all. While listening to Dr. Duke, one comes to understand that he is not like the controlled mass media would have you believe. Dr. Duke is an extremely intelligent, highly educated thoughtful man. Dr. Duke narrates this free copy of his book during the recent Israeli war on Lebanon and this timely commentary is extremely insightful. The Jews have much to answer for.
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3541348/Dr._David_Duke_-_Spoken_Word_-_Jewish_Supremacism
NO war for Israel!
"227"! Domestic cockroach strikes again!...
Re: 228, what does that have to do at all with this discussion? I might have rambled on a bit, but at least I remained on topic.
WD, It's disrespectful to advertise on another website like that. If you want to help, live an honorable life and refrain from such spamming.
Frank
What does it have to do with the topic of this thread? Everything. This would not be occuring were not for the passage of the 1965 immigration act which also the bossman to import an unlimited of scab workers form India and other non-white nations.
The economic dispossession of the majority Native Born White American population goess hand-in-hand with the racial dispossession of the majority Native Born White American population.
My reply number 230 was solely in response to reply number 228.
I was replying to the post made by "WD" and not one by Brian Wheeler.
I apologise for the murkiness of my post number 230.
I certainly did not intend to "disrespect" this site. My post was not an "advertisement" for The Pirate Bay, nor for the profit of Dr. Duke. I am not affiliated with either of these entities. I felt that this free resource that I "informed" the readers of this site about is vitally important to all thinking people. This free book is quite shocking and it was a wakeup call for me. Dr. Duke was mentioned on this site and I only wanted to share this important information. If I am still in error, then I can only beg forgiveness for the intrusion and I will trouble you no more.
Thank you for your time.
NO war for Israel!
I'm sure you meant well
I'm only a reader of Chronicles btw, but I just didn't see how the war was relevant here. I was only trying to show you that posting about a book on a the Iraqi War in a writeback to an article on immigration is akin to spam. I've made the same mistake before in the past though.
Most here would agree that Israel has some to do with our war in the Middle East btw, but it's America's own corruption that has given them such influence. They're simply acting in the best interests of their own people as we should be for ours.
“Most here would agree that Israel has some to do with our war in the Middle East btw”
Yeah, “some to do”. We were all born yesterday, and so have no clue what that might possibly be.
“but it’s America’s own corruption that has given them such influence.”
Nostra culpa, right. (“btw”, isn’t there a Shia sub-sect that practices self-flagellation? I had always beleived they lived in wretched Iran.)
“They’re simply acting in the best interests of their own people”
That’s right. Quite “simply”, as you say. Only “in the best interests of their own people” (here we are on the same page). Such as, acquiring Palestine, Middle East, U.S.A. - and beyond. Of course, ruling the whole World by proxy requires some petty sacrifices (such as American lives, not only in N.Y.C., but also in Iraq, Iran – and beyond).
“as we should be for ours.”
Here, btw, we very obviously part our ways.
Jimmy,
thanks for the (MUCH-NEEDED!) corrections you've made (195) in regard to your previous comment (191). Yes, any comparison of Serbs with Nazis would not be only "too extreme", it would be also an outrageous rape of my nation's history, knowing that the Serbs were the FIRST ONES to rise against Nazis in occupied Europe and to have the greatest percentage of resistance figthers (practically, the whole people) in entire Nazi-occupied part of the continent. And up to one million Serbs died in Nazi retributions, raids and concentration camps (the most infamous, Jasenovac, held by Croatian Nazis, where more than a half a million Serbs, along with tens of thousands of Jews and Gypsies, died in the most horrid imaginable circumstances). If you're looking for a Nazi-conncection, try with our neighbors. I'm not playing the Hatfield-McCoy here (nor trying to insult anyone), but that is the history, like it or not. It's all in the books, most of the written by non-Serb WW2 historians.
Plus, there is no such thing as "white nationalism" as a visible political platform among Serbs. Even the most "right-wing", "far right-nationalist" party in Serbia is (as we speak) being the most popular among Gypsy/Roma-community, believe it or not.
And Milosevic himself was an old school-leftist, without a drop of any racist sentiment (unlike, for example, his Croatian counterpart, Franjo Tudjman, a vicious Holocaust denier, or Alija Izetbegovic, Bosnian Muslim leader, an ex-SS trooper, turned into an Islamic fundamentalist). Or just check the data on ethnic diversity of Serbia, and compare it with the other ex-Yu states.
I'm not enaging into a Balkan discussion here, which would hopelessly turn this topic away from its initial subject. Just trying to help you with the facts and figures you've mentioned. You don't have to believe me or take my word on anything, but please, next time check the facts (on Google or elsewhere) before labeling the first European anti-fascist nation in such inappropriate manner.
"It’s all in the books, most of the written by non-Serb WW2 historians."
This should read: It’s all in the books, most of them written by non-Serb WW2 historians.
"conncections" are, of course, "connections"
There must be dozens of typos left, but I'm giving up. An edit-version would be great on this site.
F.,
We can't blame the Jews for all of our problems.
I'm from the South, and I can tell you that though blacks aren't as intelligent they would do much better if they quit blaming the white man and sought out better jobs.
---
I meant that Western nations should generally act in their best interests as do the Jews. This is what healthy nations do.
However, I stated previously in this thread that Christians should act within Christian morality.
First, I left only one post above, #198. An imposter left post #202 under my name. Web-page editor please take note.
Second, why is it that NO ONE on this site EVER addresses the substance of my consistently similar writebacks wrt the problem of race?
Again, for Mr. Willoughby and others who just don't "get it", why don't you try answering my question (variants of which I have been posting for months or maybe years on this site): how will traditional America, and by extension Western Civ, survive if whites should become a minority in our own historic territories?
And second, if race, specifically the non-white immigration invasion and colonization of the West, is not the most important issue of our time, what is?
I call all discussion of EVERY OTHER ISSUE BESIDES RACE 'treason' (it is also arguably sinful from a Christian perspective) not because there are not many other political and social issues of importance, to me and all other conservatives, but because the racial invasion seems to be the only issue/policy whose deleterious effects we can never undo (well, we could undo even it ... but not without a bunch of Christian blowhards blathering about the alleged dangers to their 'souls' from executing the necessary actions; funny how an earlier generation of Christians didn't offer up much objection - no worries about the souls of the WW2 generation - to the militarily superfluous mass-incineration of a million German women and children in the Spring of 1945, but hey - killing white people is fine for the Christers, it's just the coloreds, who are ever so respectful and considerate of us, that we need to fawn over until the end of time ... for the sake of our souls .....).
But because the CHRONICLES crowd can't stomach the measures of racial cleansing and repatriation which will be necessary if our race and therefore civilization is to survive in perpetuity, it seems to be all the more vital that we mobilize ALL our energies now to stopping non-white immigration, as well as to engendering a new racial consciousness among whites, who will need it to assert their own cultural prerogatives in the public square (and we must assert ourselves, or our far more assertive racial enemies / competitors will own our future, and our descendants will ultimately be genetically absorbed into the mongrel morass).
Discussing or agitating on other issues is functionally, and sometimes intentionally, treasonous because such merely serves to distract us from the real issue, and therefore prevents our operating with maximal efficiency, and possibly endangers the ultimate agenda (survival of the West). Suppose Course A is the most effective way to achieve a certain national security objective, but the SecDef vigorously argues for Course B, which he knows will be far more costly and may possibly even jeopardize the chance of overall success. Can it not be said that SecDef is behaving treasonously (of course, we would need more details to establish whether he was really a traitor, or merely stupid)?
If America and the West were not being invaded and occupied by the Third World, then obviously our white racial survival would not be at issue, and conservatives could frolic in other policy vineyards to their hearts' content. But we are under demographic attack. If we do not repulse that attack, then the end of the West will be certain. If these facts and prognostications are (empirically) true, then it follows that persons who agitate against any issues of lesser importance (abortion, taxes, regulations, etc.) are effectively reducing the chances of Occidental survival, whether deliberately or not (ie, out of stupidity). I call such people traitors.
Mr. Hader,
If you don't read the others' posts, you can't expect to find what you're looking for in them.
Anyway, the problem many modern Christians seem to have is with separating the spiritual and political worlds. In the Lord's eyes we're all equally His children, but such is not the case with us in the material world of his creation.
Off topic: Some (atheistic) pagans argue that Christianity is dysgenic, and this too is simply not true. We can help the weak and the poor without helping them to reproduce... The evolution obsessed (who are among the most leftist - love of evolution is little different from creative destructives or perpetual revolutionaries, though I want to say the latter are pursuing a final world order.)
The OT bit doesn't apply to you, Mr. Hader. I simply think it belongs with the rest of this post.
---
Also, if anyone actually bothers to read my posts
, it should be clear that I do not believe all but race should be ignored. Without the tradition, culture, and religion to guide us, we cannot hope to save our nation. Ignoring everything else is profoundly stupid. Also, of course the nation exists to serve the Lord.
That said, I agree that the pending war with Iran and similar issues should be of little concern relative to the American demographic crisis. We are not responsible for the emperor's crimes against Iran. Saving our own is our duty, and we should wish to do nothing less.
---
An addendum in case Mr. Hader or someone else actually reads my post and can benefit..., since the fed is working to destroy America, its power should be reduced. Since abortion is immoral and corrupts us, it should be opposed. To ignore them totally is as stupid as hoisting up one at the expense of all else. Those who sacrifice the immigration issue for abortion are failing to do their duty and should thusly be shamed. Such males should not be recognised as men. That said, David Duke who promotes abortion because of its demographic results is a monster and should not be recognised as human (meaning he should not be respected. He should not be harmed of course.) We can oppose immigration and support repatriation without embracing murder, including abortion; violence; hate; or other un-Christian acts. For the Lord of the Rings fans: reject the ring of power - it only seems to offer what you want. Embracing abortion will destroy your nation.
Mr. Hader, read Race and the American Prospect which can be purchased at the occidental quarterly.
Sincerely,
Little Frankie (who fears his posts in the Writebacks have never made a positive difference
)