<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sense and Sensibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/04/18/sense-and-sensibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/04/18/sense-and-sensibility/</link>
	<description>Your home for traditional conservatism.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Alpert</title>
		<link>http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2007/04/18/sense-and-sensibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19852</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Alpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://temp.macdock.com/chroniclesmagazine/?p=20#comment-19852</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. As it happens I&#039;m teaching a seminar on Jane Austen--the aim of which is to rescue her from the &quot;chicklit&quot; image which has in effect turned her into a precursor of Danielle Steele. Sense and Sensibility is a very great novel--I mean very great as in Shakespeare Homer (she must have read Pope or  Cowper&#039;s translations) Would not  Dr. Fleming agree that while she has no use for mush( in fact understands it as destructive) and views &quot;Improvement&quot; suspiciously (&quot;the idol of our age&quot; Cowper) She would welcome feeling rooted in good judgement? Just as she despises  Lord Chesterfield&#039;s notion of &quot;manners&quot; she welcomes the word as used by Dr. Johnson. I wish you had said more about her. The barbarians are after her and like Elinor and Marianne she needs protection from the new Lucy Steeles and Willoughbys of this world whose only purpose is  to tempt and corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. As it happens I'm teaching a seminar on Jane Austen--the aim of which is to rescue her from the "chicklit" image which has in effect turned her into a precursor of Danielle Steele. Sense and Sensibility is a very great novel--I mean very great as in Shakespeare Homer (she must have read Pope or  Cowper's translations) Would not  Dr. Fleming agree that while she has no use for mush( in fact understands it as destructive) and views "Improvement" suspiciously ("the idol of our age" Cowper) She would welcome feeling rooted in good judgement? Just as she despises  Lord Chesterfield's notion of "manners" she welcomes the word as used by Dr. Johnson. I wish you had said more about her. The barbarians are after her and like Elinor and Marianne she needs protection from the new Lucy Steeles and Willoughbys of this world whose only purpose is  to tempt and corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

